Robert Mueller Wrote a 'Bish, What?' Letter to the Attorney General After Barr Remixed the Special Counsel's Report

For those not up on game, shortly after Special counsel Robert Mueller released the findings of his two-year investigation into whether Russia colluded with the Trump administration to steal the 2016 presidential election, Attorney General William Barr condensed this 448-page report down to a four-page memo given to Congress in which Barr claimed that the…

For those not up on game, shortly after Special counsel Robert Mueller released the findings of his two-year investigation into whether Russia colluded with the Trump administration to steal the 2016 presidential election, Attorney General William Barr condensed this 448-page report down to a four-page memo given to Congress in which Barr claimed that the president didnโ€™t commit obstruction of justice.

Video will return here when scrolled back into view
Trump’s Tariffs Might Stick Around. What Should We Buy Now?
Trump’s Tariffs Might Stick Around. What Should We Buy Now?

Whatโ€™s odd about this is that Muellerโ€™s report didnโ€™t conclude whether or not the president committed obstruction of justice. But for some reason, Barr, aka Fred Flintstone Face, aka Evil John Goodman Face, decided he would conclude that the president didnโ€™t commit obstruction of justice even though no one asked him to. The president took a Twitter victory lap, claiming that heโ€™d been exonerated and that all of itโ€”the investigation, all the indictments, all the claimsโ€”were a part of a larger witch hunt by Democrats to throw him out of office, and that it didnโ€™t work.

Now, The Washington Post has uncovered a letter sent from Mueller to Barr in late March that basically statedโ€”and Iโ€™m paraphrasing hereโ€”โ€œBitch, you played my 448-page investigation into a four-page memo that gutted all the feeling I put into it!โ€

Not only did Mueller send a letter, but the two menโ€”one of whom has a side job at Slate Rock and Gravel Companyโ€”hopped on the phone to try and hash it out. While The Root was unable to get a transcript of the actual phone call, I have been writing about this shit long enough to be able to channel Muellerโ€™s voice, which I will do here: โ€œBitch, you played me. Are you working for that Bama? I shouldโ€™ve know that you werenโ€™t to be trusted. It was 448-pages; ainโ€™t no way in hell you read it that fast. Oh, youโ€™re a speed reader now? I should kick your...hello?โ€

Fine, hereโ€™s what Muellerโ€™s letter to the Justice Department actually said, according to The Post:

The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this officeโ€™s work and conclusions,โ€ Mueller wrote, according to The Washington Post. โ€œThere is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations.

The Post notes that the letter also requested that Muellerโ€™s long-ass homework project be released in full and noted a few places that could be redacted.

Justice Department officials told The Post that they were taken aback by the tone of Muellerโ€™s letter (told yโ€™all he was pissed) and added that they were surprised that he had these concerns. Barr told Congress that Mueller didnโ€™t want to review his four-page letter because it was fucking four-pages of โ€œcome watch Trump throw a football over a mountain.โ€

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVt6uvHI134

From The Post:

A day after Mueller sent his letter to Barr, the two men spoke by phone for about 15 minutes, according to law enforcement officials. In that call, Mueller said he was concerned that media coverage of the obstruction investigation was misguided and creating public misunderstandings about the officeโ€™s work, according to Justice Department officials.

Mueller did not express similar concerns about the public discussion of the investigation of Russiaโ€™s election interference, the officials said. Barr has testified previously he did not know whether Mueller supported his conclusion on obstruction.

When Barr pressed Mueller on whether he thought Barrโ€™s memo to Congress was inaccurate, Mueller said he did not but felt that the media coverage of it was misinterpreting the investigation, officials said.

In their call, Barr also took issue with Mueller calling his memo a โ€œsummary,โ€ saying he had never intended to summarize the voluminous report, but instead provide an account of its top conclusions, officials said.

Justice Department officials told The Post that the conversation was more cordial than the letter, but the two men couldnโ€™t agree on how to move forward. Barr wanted to release the full report with redactions and didnโ€™t see the reasoning for releasing portions of the report as Mueller reportedly suggested.

According to claims, Mueller was more concerned with the publicโ€™s interpretation of Barrโ€™s four-page summary and not the full report.

โ€œAfter the Attorney General received Special Counsel Muellerโ€™s letter, he called him to discuss it,โ€ a Justice Department spokeswoman told The Post Tuesday evening. โ€œIn a cordial and professional conversation, the Special Counsel emphasized that nothing in the Attorney Generalโ€™s March 24 letter was inaccurate or misleading. But, he expressed frustration over the lack of context and the resulting media coverage regarding the Special Counselโ€™s obstruction analysis. They then discussed whether additional context from the report would be helpful and could be quickly released.โ€

โ€œHowever, the Attorney General ultimately determined that it would not be productive to release the report in piecemeal fashion,โ€ the spokeswoman said. โ€œThe Attorney General and the Special Counsel agreed to get the full report out with necessary redactions as expeditiously as possible. The next day, the Attorney General sent a letter to Congress reiterating that his March 24 letter was not intended to be a summary of the report, but instead only stated the Special Counselโ€™s principal conclusions, and volunteered to testify before both Senate and House Judiciary Committees on May 1 and 2.โ€

Mueller punted. Thatโ€™s the takeaway here. Mueller couldโ€™ve concluded that that the president did or didnโ€™t commit obstruction of justice. The report he created described at least 10 significant episodes of possible obstruction of justice. But Mueller, who we already know knows how to work a phone because he surely called Barr to complain about his four-page summation, couldnโ€™t call someone to ask if he had to adhere to a long-standing Justice Department policy that says a sitting president cannot be indicted and for that reason, here we are. Mueller punted and Fred Flintstone Face ran it back for a touchdown.

Straight From The Root

Sign up for our free daily newsletter.