Passing for Black?

Illustration for article titled Passing for Black?

It created a minor media frenzy last spring when President Barack Obama checked the "Black, African Am., or Negro" box on his census form and, as an item on The Root put it, "set the post-racial dream back 400 years." Elizabeth Chang, a mother of (Asian-Caucasian) biracial daughters and an editor at the Washington Post, excoriated him on that paper's op-ed page for failing to "celebrate" his biracial ancestry. And Michelle Hughes, president of the Chicago Biracial Family Network, voiced a complaint that many seemed to share when she observed that "the multiracial community feels a sense of disappointment that he refuses to identify with us."


A new study in the December 2010 issue of Social Psychology Quarterly, entitled "Passing as Black: Racial Identity Work Among Biracial Americans," is likely to rekindle the debate by providing evidence that black-white biracial adults are increasingly choosing, like Obama, to emphasize their blackness and downplay their white ancestry. In what the study calls "a striking reverse pattern of passing," a majority of respondents reported that they "pass" as black.

History, of course, is full of Anatole Broyard stories of mixed-race blacks who have personally profited by camouflaging their racial makeup and pretending to be white. What is novel today, according to the study, is that "multiracial individuals now feel more free to experiment with their identity and many express pride in their blackness and take steps to accent attributes that they consider black."


Expressing pride in their blackness — that is a good thing, and the authors of the study use their data to make the case that this phenomenon of reverse passing demonstrates that blackness itself is less stigmatized today than in the past, which is certainly evidence of progress. However, what is troubling about the study is also what I find so disturbing about the criticism surrounding Obama's census decision — namely, the flawed premise that in America, an opposition can exist between "biracial" and "black."

But what the advocates for biracial self-identification, as well as the authors of this study, fail to grasp is precisely what I have always been so proud of Obama for recognizing and exemplifying: Blackness in America is by definition a mongrel affair. Biracial blacks do not have to "pass" as black; they just are black.

Aside from genuine African Americans — which is to say, actual African immigrants and their unmixed descendants legally residing in the United States of America — and some West Indians as well, there are few black people in this country who can claim purely African ancestry. (Does, say, Beyoncé Knowles have to check the white box on her census form, too? Is she just passing? She certainly didn't get that caramel complexion from Nigeria alone!)

Conversations about race quickly become silly. It would be helpful to keep in mind that the simplest explanation is more likely the correct one, and to apply Occam's razor to the feel-good flab that so often clings to any discussion of multiracial identity today. As James Baldwin famously observed, "the story of the Negro in America is the story of America" [italics are my own] — with European, Native American, Asian and Latino subplots throughout. To be black in this country is necessarily to be of a mix — both genetically and, more important, culturally. The category "black or Negro" is itself varied and hybrid in essence, and it comfortably contains within it the subcategory "multiracial" or mulatto


"Who wills to be a Negro? I do!" Ralph Ellison wrote. Ellison himself was no purebred, and it is heartening to see so many others today who are willing the same thing. We make a mistake, however, when we call this passing — it is simply being.

Thomas Chatterton Williams is the author of Losing My Cool: How a Father's Love and 15,000 Books Beat Hip-Hop Culture. Follow him on Twitter.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter