Kamala Harris and AOC Introduce Legislation That Protects Formerly Incarcerated People Against Federal Housing Discrimination

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) speaks during a television interview after the second night of the first Democratic presidential debate on June 27, 2019, in Miami.
Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) speaks during a television interview after the second night of the first Democratic presidential debate on June 27, 2019, in Miami.
Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images

U.S. Senator and presidential candidate Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) is introducing a bill Wednesday with freshman Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) that aims to protect people with criminal records from discriminatory policies in federal housing.

Advertisement

According to Sen. Harris’s office, the Fair Chance at Housing Act is designed to cut down on recidivism by helping ex-offenders secure housing and making sure people currently receiving federal housing assistance are not evicted unjustifiably. The main features of the bill include banning “1-strike” policies which empower landlords to evict tenants for a single occurrence of criminal activity, even if it is a minor incident. Former President Bill Clinton first ordered HUD to implement the policy in 1996 in tenant screening and lease agreements, according to The Los Angeles Times.

As it now stands, an entire family can be evicted based on the actions of one member or a guest of a family member. Alternatively, under Harris and Ocasio-Cortez’s bill, Public Housing Authorities would have to apply a more holistic approach when screening and evicting tenants based on criminal actions. More critically, public housing officials would not be able to deny housing to people with criminal records under the legislation.

Advertisement

Andre Perry, a fellow at the Brookings Institute who specializes in housing equity (and a contributor to The Root), said that any legislation banning the “1-strike” rule will have a positive impact on those trying to bring stability to their lives without the threat of jail or homelessness hanging over their heads.

“Bipartisan passage of the First Step Act in 2018, which created programs that help reduce recidivism, signaled that even a fractured Congress believes that returning citizens deserve a real chance,” Perry told The Root. “I see Harris and AOC’s plan as a next step. However, HUD must change a culture that sees “1-strike” policies among several [other] lease violations as an effective strategy for providing safe housing.”

The “1-strike” rule was designed to target people selling drugs in public housing. But, like the 1994 Crime Bill, the rule disproportionately hit black and brown people especially hard. A 2004 report by Human Rights Watch criticized the order, saying that it discriminated against the formerly incarcerated.

In May, Ocasio-Cortez asked Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson during a House Financial Services Committee hearing if he would consider a more comprehensive alternative to the “1-strike” rule. He said, “I’m always in favor of more flexibility.”

Advertisement

It is difficult to find data pointing to exactly how many people are denied housing because of “1-strike,” but Human Rights Watch via a Freedom of Information Act request, noted that in 2001 HUD reported “46,657 applicants for conventional, project-based public housing were denied admission in 2002 because of ‘one strike]’ criteria” but that this figure represents “only a fraction of applicants rejected because of their criminal records.”

In a statement introducing the act, Harris said, “Too many people become involved in our criminal justice system and serve their time only to return home to face additional barriers to employment, education, and housing. As our country continues working toward much-needed reform of our criminal justice system, I am proud to work with Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez to ensure formerly incarcerated individuals and their families have access to safe and affordable housing as they transition back into their communities.”

Advertisement

Ocasio-Cortez added that the act is a good first step to preparing America’s broken criminal justice system.

“The denial of basic necessities to formerly incarcerated people does not make our communities safer,” she said. “Denying housing to those that have been formerly incarcerated increases recidivism. Today we are taking a step to make our communities safer.”

Advertisement

Additionally, the Fair Chance at Housing Act would:

  • Prohibit the use of suspicionless drug and alcohol testing by owners and Public Housing Authorities;
  • Provide PHAs with additional administrative funding for helping to house ex-offenders through the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program;
  • Authorize $10 million in bonus funding for homeless service providers through the Continuum of Care program to serve ex-offenders.
Advertisement

A spokesperson from Harris’ Senate office told The Root that she has been working on the bill with Rep. Ocasio-Cortez over the last few months. The California senator has seen her star rise significantly since her showing at the second Democratic debate where she spared with frontrunner Joe Biden over his comments boasting his working relationship with segregationist lawmakers.

The Fair Chance at Housing Act follows Harris’ $100 billion black homeownership plan announced at Essence Fest this weekend.

Advertisement

Perry said that addressing housing discrimination against people who were incarcerated is a small step in the right direction.

“There’re already not enough affordable housing units available,” he said. “A mistake by an individual should not put an entire family in peril, especially when it ultimately punishes an entire community.”

Terrell Jermaine Starr is a senior reporter at The Root. He is currently writing a book proposal that analyzes US-Russia relations from a black perspective.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

feministonfire
FeministOnFire

Yeah, that sounds good, unless you Know! Oh, I’m prepared for flaming:

I can’t agree with loosening the 1-strike rule. I live in a mixed income sub with new houses amidst Section 8 housing. The threat of eviction (rarely enforced for domestic violence, fighting, disturbing the peace) after repeated reporting is the one thing allowing the homeowners any semblance of peace! There are distinct patterns of behavior that I LIVE WITH EVERY DAY that are completely within the residents control: keep your ex-con sons and deadbeat boyfriend’s behavior in check!

It shouldn’t be that hard except me employing surveillance cameras, video camera, audio tape, pictures, repeated police calls, City Council appearances and tens of emails personally before Finally resulting in five evictions tell a different tale. Boyfriend fighting you in the street has to show his face, her face and the street address with damage to the property before eviction is even entertained as a solution. A police report and arrest is not enough. Fresh outta jail grandson menacingly posted in the street stopping every car that passes and shouldn’t be living with you just leaves when inspectors arrive. Somehow a single mother with two kids moves in all by herself but suddenly gets a boyfriend as soon as tax time allows her to buy a car and then all his drug-dealing, loud music thumping buddies visit 10 times a day. You and your kids’ survival depends on this $11 a month rent but you can’t LIVE without a man AND you can’t MAKE him stop jeopardizing your home?! Then all y’all got to go!

Y’all can’t say one thing to convince me otherwise. Opting to buy in this sub is the worst decision I ever made!