Updated on 10/6/2023 at 6:20 a.m. PT: Jason Derulo is speaking out following his bombshell sexual harassment lawsuit.
In a post to X/Twitter late Thursday, the singer put up a video defending his character and motives, explaining that he stands against all forms of harassment and supports anyone following their dreams.
Suggested Reading
βI wouldnβt normally comment but these claims are completely false and hurtful. I stand against all forms of harassment and I remain supportive of anybody following their dreams. Iβve always strived to live my life in a positively impactful way, and thatβs why I sit here before you deeply offended, by these defamatory claims. God bless.β
See original story below.
It looks like legal troubles are brewing for singer Jason Derulo as heβs been named at the center of a new sexual harassment lawsuit on Thursday.
According to legal documents first obtained by NBC News, plaintiff and up-and-coming artist Emaza Gibson is alleging sexual harassment, intimidation and violence, illegal retaliatory termination, breach of contract and more against the βTalk Dirtyβ singer. The complaint was also filed against his manager Frank Harris, Atlantic Recording Corporation, Future History, Inc., and Radio Corporation of America (RCA Records). Derulo is the co-founder and principal of Future and a supervising agent at Atlantic. Future is a joint venture between RCA, Derulo and Harris.
Gibson was brought onto Deruloβs record label under the guise jumpstarting her music career and making multiple albums together in November 2021, but the relationship allegedly turned into one that included βthreats of violence, unwanted and illegal sexual harassment, pressuring her to drink and have sex with him.β In her complaint, she names numerous instances where Derulo allegedly made inappropriate comments, became aggressive and verbally hostile, and nearly became physically violent with her for being late to a studio session.
She also alleged that she was told early on that in order to succeed βin this business,β she would have to essentially pay for play sexually.
βWhile recording music, DERULO informed Plaintiff that if she wanted to be successful in the βthis businessβ (aka, the music industry), Plaintiff [Gibson] would be required to partake in βgoat skin and fish scales,β which is a Haitian reference referring to conducting sex rituals, sacrificing a goat, goat blood and doing cocaine,ββ the lawsuit reads. βThe manner and timing of such a statement meant that DERULO was demanding sexual acts from Plaintiff in order for DERULO to fulfill his role as her mentor, supervisor and musical collaborator. This explicit demand for sex-in-exchange-for-success was reinforced through DERULOβs subsequent behavior.β
Gibson alleges that she informed Harris, Future and Atlantic of Deruloβs βsexually, emotionally and physically inappropriate behavior,β but that no action was done on her behalf. Instead, she alleges her contract was terminated in retaliation. As a result of Deruloβs, Atlanticβs, Future History and Harrisβ conduct, Gibson says she required βmedical intervention for breakdowns, weight loss, insomnia, mood swings, hopelessness, loss of motivation, betrayal, feelings of betrayal and deception.β She also had to allegedly seek mental health treatment where she received a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder.
Sheβs seeking damages for unpaid wages, loss of earnings, deferred compensation, other employment benefits, emotional distress, punitive damages and more.
Derulo has yet to respond to the suit.
In a statement responding to the suit, Gibsonβs attorner Ron Zambrano said:
βMr. Deruloβs behavior toward this young artist was despicable, and, unfortunately, another example of the music industryβs dark underbelly. He not only broke promises and breached contracts, but his threats of physical harm and unconscionable sexual advances toward this young woman who is just trying to break into the industry were outrageous and illegal.
βExecutives knew of Deruloβs behavior without a care. No one should have to suffer through such treatment by their employer, and in this case, by someone who preyed on the plaintiffβs vulnerabilities and desire to succeed, then just threw her away like garbage when he didnβt get his way.β
Straight From
Sign up for our free daily newsletter.