As a piece of pop art, as a nostalgia delivery device, as a triumph in film editing and story construction, and as a coronatine monotony breaker, The Last Dance delivers. Thereβs not much new information here for meβI became an NBA diehard in 1986, and I saw much of whatβs depicted here in real-timeβbut itβs still been an entertaining and fascinating watch. Especially when rewatching things at 41 that I first experienced as a teen, and how that shift in perspective also shifts how Iβm processing what I witnessed. (For instance, when Mike hit those six threes against the Blazers in game one of the 1992 Finals, I was jumping out of my seat, my skin. But now? Itβs...quaint seeing a guard shoot wide-open, flat-footed threes, and Iβm thinking βWHY ARE THEY GIVING HIM SO MUCH SPACE? HEβS NOT EVEN JUMPING! AT LEAST PUT A HAND UP, MOTHERFUCKERS!β)
That said, while itβs been branded as a documentary, it shares more elements of the sort of biographical miniseries associated with BET or Lifetime. I wouldnβt quite call it propaganda, but itβs not quite not propaganda, either. Because what else do you call a 10-part series where the subject approved all the footage and has the last word of commentary on it and only agreed to do it after they believed that their legacy was sincerely threatened by someone else?
Suggested Reading
From the New York Times:
But the timing of his agreeing to cooperate with the producer Mike Tollin is apt: As Tollin said in an article in The New York Times last week, Jordanβs cooperation to participate in the documentary and greenlight the release of the long-hidden footage came on the same day that James and the Cleveland Cavaliers were celebrating winning the N.B.A. championship in 2016. That is some grain of salt.
βI take a redeye to Charlotte for a meeting, I turn on ESPN in the morning as Iβm getting dressed, and thereβs the Cavaliersβ parade as Iβm heading in to see Michael,β Tollin said of his first face-to-face meeting with Jordan and his business advisers Estee Portnoy and Curtis Polk. βHe said yes in the room, which doesnβt happen too often in my business.β
In a miniseries devoid of any real bombshells or unique insights, this obsession with LeBron James is definitely one. While Mike is in everyoneβs head, LeBron is in his.
Michael Jordan is still the greatest NBA player, with an on-court shadow so menacing that heβs broken the brains of many basketball fans whoβve conditioned themselves to only acknowledge greatness in Jordan facsimiles. This is how Kobe Bryantβs legacy sneaks into a conversation it doesnβt have the range for, and why some twist themselves into illogical origami to make people believe that they actually believe Kawhi Leonard is the best NBA player today.
Itβs near impossible to have a career and legacy greater than Mike did. But itβs not impossible to be a better and/or more effective basketball player than he was, and the more dispassionate the comparisons between him and LeBronβin this contextβget, the messier they are.
Maybe you disagree. But one thing is clear, Mike himself agrees that the comparison is messy. And messy here means valid. He wouldnβt have greenlit, produced, and starred in this hagiography if he didnβt. You donβt switch the fan on unless you feel the heat.
Straight From
Sign up for our free daily newsletter.