Vote 2020 graphic
Everything you need to know about and expect during
the most important election of our lifetimes

Restrictions on Gay Men Donating Blood Eased by FDA

Illustration for article titled Restrictions on Gay Men Donating Blood Eased by FDA
Photo: Mario Tama (Getty Images)

At this point, you probably don’t need me to reiterate that hospitals are in short supply of, well, everything. Thankfully, the Food and Drug Administration made some moves on Thursday that will hopefully ease at least one of those shortages.


NBC News reports that the FDA has reduced its restrictions on gay men donating blood. Initially, gay men had to be abstinent for an entire year before they were eligible to donate blood. That restriction has now been reduced to only 90 days. This comes following a petition GLADD started to get the FDA to reduce these restrictions. This was not the only change the FDA made.

From NBC News:

Other 12-month deferral periods have also been shortened under the new guidelines, including those for people who have traveled to areas with certain endemic diseases, those who have engaged in injection drug use and people who have participated in commercial sex work.


Restrictions have also been reduced for people who’ve recently gotten tattoos or piercings, in an effort to get more people to donate blood. Many of these restrictions were made during the height of the HIV/AIDS epidemic through the ‘80s and ‘90s. With more information about how long it takes for HIV antibodies to show up in the bloodstream as well as more preventive measures such as PrEP (Pre-exposure prophylaxis) being introduced in recent years, these restrictions have long been seen as outdated.

It’s good that old biases are being re-evaluated and changed. It’s just really sad that it took a pandemic for that to happen. Letting perfectly healthy gay people donate blood should not have been one of the “desperate measures” taken to help with the crisis.

Jr Staff Writer @TheRoot. Watcher of wrestling, player of video games. Mr. Steal Your Disney+ Password.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter


There has to be a non-discriminatory reason for a rule like that. Presumably the problem isn’t oral sex but anal sex. But even if the problem is anal sex then the rule should be the same regardless of sexual orientation. Heterosexual anal sex is no less dangerous than gay anal sex.