Image: iStock

While Dr. Dre’s $70 million in donations daughter was somehow able to get into USC based “entirely” on her own merit, for many black children, the process to attend their college of choice is an obstacle course of anxiety and racial bias. And while our experiences as perpetual victims of prejudice are irrefutable, it’s always interesting when official studies are conducted to confirm what we already know.

To that point, did you know that public universities purposely—and disproportionately—focus their recruiting efforts on rich white kids that look nothing like your non-affluent, non-white ass?

No, really. It’s true!

In a new report dubbed “Recruiting the Out-of-State University” comes the shocking realization that “the enrollment priorities of some public research universities are biased against poor communities and communities of color.”

“A small number of universities exhibit recruiting patterns broadly consistent with the historical mission of social mobility for meritorious state residents,” said the report. “However, most universities concentrated recruiting visits in wealthy, out-of-state communities while also privileging affluent schools in in-state visits.”

Advertisement

Wait, what? No way!

The 69-page report, culled from analyzing the recruiting patterns of admission officials at 15 public research universities visiting local high schools, comes from the fine folks at UCLA—which boasts a minuscule 3 percent black student base—and the University of Arizona, with an equally anemic 4.2 percent.

But what else did they find? Glad you asked.

  • Most public research universities really, really, really like recruiting out-of-state students instead of those found in their home state. Twelve of 15 universities made more out-of-state visits than in-state visits and 7 of 15 universities made more than twice as many out-of-state visits than in-state visits.
  • If you don’t live in a major metropolitan area, good luck. Out-of-state visits are concentrated in affluent communities within major metropolitan areas, ignoring rural communities.
  • If you don’t live in an affluent community, good luck. All universities were much more likely to visit out-of-state public high schools in high-income communities than schools in low-income communities, even after controlling for factors related to recruiting visits such as enrollment size and student achievement.
  • If live in a community of color, good luck. Most universities were significantly less likely to visit out-of-state public high schools with a high percentage of Black, Latinx and Native American students, even after controlling for other factors.
  • If you attend a private school, it’s your lucky day. Most universities visit a disproportionate number of out-of-state private schools.

Advertisement

The report also notes that these recruiting practices “contribute to a student composition where low-income students of color feel increasingly isolated amongst growing cohorts of affluent, predominantly white, out-of-state students.”

You think?

Additionally, U.S. News notes that these findings mirror those uncovered by the Education Trust, in which “only about half of states enroll a representative share of black students at their community and technical colleges, despite the fact that students of color disproportionately attend such colleges.”

Advertisement

“We’re still more comfortable blaming individuals of color for failing to get a higher education, despite knowing that there are gross inequalities in the P-12 and college systems in terms of funding, teacher experience, access to rigorous curricular options, and the like,” Andrew Nichols, co-author of the report, and the Education Trust’s senior director of higher education research said in a statement.

“We’ve been doing things around the margins that pay lip service to equity, but we’re not doing enough to break up the systems that are designed to push certain people away,” he said.

“These recruiting patterns are a function of university enrollment priorities,” read an additional report, which revealed that recruiting patterns are directly linked to state divestment in higher education. “In turn, these enrollment priorities are a function of a broken system of state higher education finance, which incentivizes universities to prioritize rich out-of-state students with lack-luster academic achievement. This is not a meritocracy.”