They made profits from mug shots, but isnβt it ironic that the owners of Mugshots.com could end up on their own site?
On Wednesday, Sahar Sarid, Thomas Keesee and Kishore Vidya Bhavnanieβthree out ofΒ four alleged owners of Mugshots.comβwere arrested and charged with extortion, money laundering and identity theft, according to the Washington Post. The infamous website harvested peopleβs mug shots and charged them exorbitant fees to have the photos removed.
Suggested Reading
The removal fees for the site range from $399 and up. And over the last several years, many people have filed lawsuits against the site, citing embarrassment and saying that just because a booking photo was taken doesnβt mean that a person has been prosecuted for a crime. But the embarrassment of having someone Google your name and your mug shot pops up has lasting effects.
βOnce subjects request that their booking photos be removed, they are routed to a secondary website called Unpublisharrest.com and charged a βde-publishingβ fee to have the content removed. Mugshots.com does not remove criminal record information until a subject pays the fee,β California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said.
βThis pay-for-removal scheme attempts to profit off of someone elseβs humiliation,β said Becerra. βThose who canβt afford to pay into this scheme to have their information removed pay the price when they look for a job, housing, or try to build relationships with others. This is exploitation, plain and simple.β
Earlier this year, Peter Gabiola filed a lawsuitΒ against Mugshots.com after he was fired an hour after starting a new job because his new boss Googled his name and saw his photo on the site.
In total, Becerra says, the owners of the site have been paid more than $2 million in removal fees. Talk about making a profit off of someone elseβs bad fortune.
Straight From
Sign up for our free daily newsletter.