While everyone is in an uproar about the repeal and replacement of the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, another bill is moving through Congress unnoticed, and if passed, it would allow companies to require employees to undergo genetic testing and have access to employee health information.
Currently, giving employers that kind of power and information is prohibited under a 2008 genetic privacy and nondiscrimination law known as GINA, but STAT reports that the new bill gets around that legislation by saying GINA does not apply when genetic tests are part of a “workplace wellness” program.
H.R. 1313, as the bill is known, was approved by a House committee on Wednesday with all 22 Republicans supporting it and all 17 Democrats opposing it. STAT reports that it is “expected to be folded into a second ACA-related measure containing a grab-bag of provisions that do not affect federal spending, as the main bill does.”
Jennifer Mathis, director of policy and legal advocacy at the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, a civil rights group, told STAT that this bill would “eviscerate” the privacy and other protections for genetic and health information in GINA and the 1990 Americans With Disabilities Act.
According to STAT, employers say they need the changes because GINA and the ADA are “not aligned in a consistent manner” with laws about workplace wellness programs.
Advertisement
From STAT:
The 2008 genetic law prohibits a group health plan—the kind employers have—from asking, let alone requiring, someone to undergo a genetic test. It also prohibits that specifically for “underwriting purposes,” which is where wellness programs come in. “Underwriting purposes” includes basing insurance deductibles, rebates, rewards, or other financial incentives on completing a health risk assessment or health screenings. In addition, any genetic information can be provided to the employer only in a de-identified, aggregated form, rather than in a way that reveals which individual has which genetic profile.
There is a big exception, however: As long as employers make providing genetic information “voluntary,” they can ask employees for it. Under the House bill, none of the protections for health and genetic information provided by GINA or the disabilities law would apply to workplace wellness programs as long as they complied with the ACA’s very limited requirements for the programs. As a result, employers could demand that employees undergo genetic testing and health screenings.
Advertisement
STAT notes that while employers would not be given workers’ names along with the genetic information, in a small company, it would not be difficult to match the genetic profile to an employee.
And, of course, there is this:
The privacy concerns also arise from how workplace wellness programs work. Employers, especially large ones, generally hire outside companies to run them. These companies are largely unregulated, and they are allowed to see genetic test results with employee names.
They sometimes sell the health information they collect from employees. As a result, employees get unexpected pitches for everything from weight-loss programs to running shoes, thanks to countless strangers poring over their health and genetic information.
Advertisement
This bill is a discriminatory disaster waiting to happen. Write to your representatives. Find out where they stand. Do not allow genetic information to be gathered under the guise of “workplace wellness.”
Read more at STAT.
