Councilwoman Challenges Shreveport’s ‘Saggy Pants Law’


Image for article titled Councilwoman Challenges Shreveport’s ‘Saggy Pants Law’
Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images

In February, 31-year-old Anthony Childs was fatally shot in Shreveport, La., by police during a chase that began after Childs was stopped because he was wearing sagging pants.

Since that tragedy, councilwoman LeVette Fuller has wanted to end a law passed in 2007 that prohibits wearing pants below the waist in the majority-black community. On Friday, according to Shreveport CBS affiliate KSLA-TV, the Shreveport City Council began looking at a proposal to repeal the law, noting that since its inception, more than 700 violations have led to the imposition of fines ranging from $100 to $250 and having to do community service. Police have even arrested individuals for nothing more than wearing baggy jeans, according to Vice, even though the law states that wearing pants below the waist is not in itself a reason to take anyone into custody.

According to the Shreveport Times, during a confrontation, Childs fled police and Officer Traveion Brooks shot at him eight times during the ensuing chase, hitting him three times. The Caddo Parish coroner, however, claimed that Childs died from one self-inflicted gunshot wound, and therefore declared his death a suicide. Brooks also says Childs shot himself, though some wonder whether Childs’ death was properly investigated. Along with the controversy of Childs’ death, the “saggy pants” law itself is contentious.

“Being able to say out loud that someone was stopped or detained because legally they were not dressed appropriately is an issue,” Fuller said, KSLA reports. “We shouldn’t give police the ability to look at a human body the same way you look at a broken tail light.”

Shreveport isn’t the only predominantly black community to pass a law that many feel amounts to policing black expression, Vice notes. Pine Lawn, Mo., for example, enacted a similar law the same year as Shreveport. Many other cities have taken up the issue of sagging pants and had to consider whether banning them is about indecency or restricting personal expression.

“We don’t legislate people leaving the beach, lake or pool in a bikini, only this particular form of clothing,” Fuller said, according to KSLA. “We’re not legislating skinheads or bikers.”


Correction: Sept. 16, 2019, 4:30 p.m. ET: This story has been edited to remove unattributed text and add fuller sourcing.



Wearing your pants sagging to where your entire buttocks are exposed is just plain dumb. A few years ago I learned that they make super hero undewear in grown ass man sizes because I saw a grown ass man at the mall with his pants sagging so low I could see his Spiderman drawers. Then just last week, I saw another grown ass man in the mall parking lot wearing Batman drawers. I DO NOT WANT TO KNOW THAT THEY MAKE SUPERHERO DRAWERS IN GROWN ASS MAN SIZES. NOR DO I WANT TO SEE THEM.

Besides being just plain dumb, having your whole ass out is unsanitary as hell.. I don’t want to sit on a surface where someone’s skidmarked underwear just touched. (Yes, I have seen skidmarks on someone’s underwear when their pants were sagging. Gross.)

That being said, I don’t agree with a law being made to legislate sagging pants, simply because it will not be enforced equitably. I’ve seen plenty of white men and boys sagging, but you know they won’t get cited at the same frequency as black and brown men and boys. I do, however, think it’s a shame that leglislating common sense has to even be a thing.

Regarding the comment in the article about wearing bikinis outside of the beach and pool, at resorts and tourist spots that I’ve been to, many hotels and restaurants and stores have signs that say cover ups must be worn over bathing suits to gain entrance. Again, this is just common sense and about not being nasty.

But then again, as my grandmother says, common sense ain’t common.  So there you have it.