Senate Republicans Promise ‘Respectful’ SCOTUS Nominee Hearings

Even as the GOP commits to a "fair and thorough" hearing, most will still vote against Judge Jackson's nomination.

Judge Ketanji Brown Jacksonโ€™s nomination hearings to the Supreme Court begin on March 21st. One Republican senator signals he may be a no vote. Another is not sure how her vote will go down. So far, all the Senate GOP collective has said is that they will keep things โ€œfairโ€ once the hearings begin, according to a report by Politico.

Video will return here when scrolled back into view
Trump’s Tariffs Might Stick Around. What Should We Buy Now?
Trump’s Tariffs Might Stick Around. What Should We Buy Now?

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IW) stated that Judge Jackson would get a โ€œfair, thoroughโ€ hearing.

From Politico:

โ€œThe best message I can give you at this point, but I think youโ€™ve heard me say it before: Itโ€™s going to be a fair, thorough hearing, and weโ€™re not going to get in the gutter like the Democrats did,โ€ said Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley, the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee.

Senate Republicans like Sen. Grassley point to the 2018 Justice Brett Kavanaugh hearings where they felt Senate Democrats made things more personal. However, Democrats do not need a single vote from Republicans to confirm Judge Jackson to the court. Republicans may find it hard to attack her on one thing, even in terms of strategy.

Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said Jackson was โ€œvery charmingโ€ and that she โ€œappears to be very intelligent,โ€ while Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) โ€” who has opposed nearly all of Bidenโ€™s judges โ€” said he โ€œliked her, personally.โ€ But Hawley added he has concerns about her โ€œoverall record on crime.โ€

Points of interest Republicans may inquire about are Jacksonโ€™s representation of Guantanamo Bay detainees during her time as a public defender. Also, the briefs she filed while in private practice for groups that opposed the George W. Bush administrationโ€™s detention policies. Lastly, they plan to raise a general question on whether Judge Jackson supports adding seats to the Supreme Court.

Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) noted that there wouldnโ€™t be a lot of coordination amongst his fellow representatives.

โ€œRepublicans? Coordinated?โ€ quipped Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), a member of the Judiciary Committee. โ€œI donโ€™t think thereโ€™s going to be a lot of coordination. Sheโ€™s not a stranger to the members of the committee โ€ฆ Her judicial philosophy, her approach to judging will be the subjects Iโ€™m going to focus on.โ€

Even if Senate Republicans elect to go the civil route, most are poised to vote against Judge Jackson for the Supreme Court anyway. Itโ€™s a pretense that Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) pushes back on.

Republicans are โ€œsetting it up that theyโ€™re just so wonderful people. You know what I have to say about that,โ€ said Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii). โ€œThey canโ€™t find enough ways that they can really attack her, so maybe theyโ€™re putting out a narrative that โ€˜look how reasonable and wonderful we all are.โ€™โ€œ

Straight From The Root

Sign up for our free daily newsletter.