JoAnn Wypijewski writes in a piece for the Nation that the story of reproductive rights and that of slavery both largely leave out the experience of black women.
Suggested Reading
โฆ The broad culture tells a standard story of the struggle for reproductive rights, beginning with the flapper, climaxing with the pill, Griswold v. Connecticut and an assumption of privacy rights under the Fourteenth Amendment and concluding with Roe v. Wade. The same culture tells a traditional story of black emancipation, beginning with the Middle Passage, climaxing with Dred Scott, Harpers Ferry and Civil War and concluding with the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. Both stories have a postscript โ a battle royal between liberation and reaction โ but, as Bridgewater asserts, โTaken together, these stories have no comprehensive meaning. They tell no collective tale. They create no expectation of sexual freedom and no protection against, or remedy for, reproductive slavery. They exist in separate spheres; that is a mistake.โ What unites them but what both leave out, except incidentally, is the experience of black women. Most significantly, they leave out โthe lost chapter of slave breeding.โ
I need to hit the pause button on the argument for a moment, because the considerable scholarship that revisionist historians have done for the past few decades has not filtered into mass consciousness. The mass-culture story of slavery is usually told in terms of economics, labor, color, men. Women outnumbered men in the enslaved population two to one by slaveryโs end, but they enter the conventional story mainly under the rubric โfamily,โ or in the cartoon triptych Mammy-Jezebel-Sapphire, or in the figure of Sally Hemmings. Yes, we have come to acknowledge, women were sexually exploited. Yes, many of the founders of this great nation prowled the slave quarters and fathered a nation in the literal as well as figurative sense. Yes, maybe rape was even rampant. That the slave system in the US depended on human beings not just as labor but as reproducible raw material is not part of the story America typically tells itself. That women had a particular currency in this system, prized for their sex or their wombs and often both, and that this uniquely female experience of slavery resonates through history to the present is not generally acknowledged. Even the left, in uncritically reiterating Malcolm Xโs distinction between โthe house Negroโ and โthe field Negro,โ erases the female experience, the harrowing reality of the โfavoriteโ that Harriet Jacobs describes in Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl.
Read JoAnnย Wypijewski's entire piece at the Nation.
Straight From
Sign up for our free daily newsletter.