Motel 6 Provided Personal Info of Guests with 'Latino-Sounding Names' to ICE Agents, Settles $12M Lawsuit

Image for article titled Motel 6 Provided Personal Info of Guests with 'Latino-Sounding Names' to ICE Agents, Settles $12M Lawsuit
Photo: Elaine Thompson (Associated Press)

With direct access to your credit card, home address and Funyuns infatuation, hotels collect more personal data than just about everyone not named Mark Zuckerberg. As such, they possess a tremendous amount of power you would hope they would wield responsibly. But sadly, not only did Motel 6 miss the memo, but they purposely compromised the safety of over 80,000 guests.


According to the Washington Post, from 2015 to 2017, seven Motel 6 locations in the state of Washington established an informal arrangement with federal immigration officials. The company provided the personal information of its guests, leading to at least nine people being detained.

“In anticipation of ICE’s daily visits, some Motel 6 locations routinely printed their guest lists and a form, referred to as a ‘law enforcement acknowledgement form,’ which the ICE agents signed upon receiving the day’s guest list,” [Washington Attorney General Bob] Ferguson’s office said Friday in a news release. “At the two Everett locations, for example, ICE agents routinely visited the motels early in the morning, sometimes twice a day, from February 2015 through September 2017. ICE agents requested the day’s guest list, circled guests with Latino-sounding names and returned to their vehicles.” Doing so is, of course, illegal. But the Washington state attorney general’s office revealed that it was specifically “Latino-sounding” names that were shared with immigration officials.

“Each time Motel 6 released a guest list, it included the private information of every guest at the hotel without their knowledge or consent, violating their expectation of privacy,” Attorney General Bob Ferguson’s office said in a statement. “The Motel 6 guest information disclosures led to significant harmful consequences, including the detention and deportation of many guests and the suffering of their families.”

Guests were approached by ICE agents and detained at Motel 6 properties, while the office states that others were detained after their hotel stay.

ABC News shared the following story of a guest who spent a single night at a Seattle location just so he could wrap Christmas presents for his four children.

“ICE agents approached him in the hotel’s parking lot, detained him and deported him some days later. His wife had to retrieve the presents and his other belongings from the Motel 6 after his arrest,” the attorney general’s office said. “The man was the sole provider for the household, and his wife is currently struggling to support their toddler and four other children.”


According to Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson, this heinous practice constituted an illegal invasion of privacy, which he responded to by filing a lawsuit against the hotel chain. On Friday, a $12 million settlement with guests who had been affected was reached.

Every guest who had their personal information illegally shared with ICE is eligible for restitution, and claimants will not be required to disclose their immigration status.


In response to the settlement, Motel 6 issued the following statement via their company spokesperson:

“The safety and security of our guests, which includes protecting guest information, is our top priority, and we are pleased to be able to reach resolution in this matter. As part of the agreement, Motel 6 will continue to enforce its guest privacy policy, which prohibits the sharing of guest information except in cases where a judicially enforceable warrant or subpoena is present, or local law requires this information.”


Ferguson responded with his own.

“Motel 6’s actions tore families apart and violated the privacy rights of tens of thousands of Washingtonians,” Ferguson said in a statement. “Our resolution holds Motel 6 accountable for illegally handing over guests’ private information without a warrant.”


weapon-a the first try suffers no trolls

I would truly GENUINELY like to know what lawyer settled this wide ranging, clearly class action eligible lawsuit, with damages to who knows how many people, for figurative pocket change.

12 million dollars... What was uncovered is almost certainly the barest, tiniest top of the iceburg. Why didn’t they widen the lawsuit if for no other reason than to investigate further possible fuckery via discovery????!!!!!

Another corporation gets to skip happily away having been “penalized” with a payout that amounts to a tiny fraction of their profits. Without admitting guilt and with no safeguards to ensure they don’t do this exact thing or something similar again...