The Supreme Court is preparing to hear another challenge to President Joe Bidenβs student loan cancellation plan, marking the second time the high courtβs justices have agreed to hear arguments about the plan.
The most recent case comes from Texas, where two student loan borrowers, Myra Brown and Alexander Taylor, filed a federal lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Education arguing that the debt relief package was improperly rolled out because there was no βnotice-and-commentβ period where individuals could weigh in on the proposal. Notably, Brown wasnβt eligible for relief under the plan because it would only cover government-issued student loans while hers were privately-issued. Taylor would have been eligible but not for the full $20,000 the Biden Administrationβs plan would have offered.
Suggested Reading
The federal judge who originally heard the case split the baby, ruling that it was OK that there was no notice-and-comment period but that the Education Department had nonetheless exceeded its authority, ultimately putting a stop to the program before any student debt could be forgiven.
While the program is in legal limbo, President Biden has put a workaround in place, extending the current pandemic-era moratorium on federal student loan payments through next June. Since it was due to expire at the end of this year, borrowers have another six monthsβ reprieve before their payments restart, assuming the administration doesnβt notch a legal win and save the program from a demise before the Supreme Court.
Conservative groups that oppose student loan forgiveness have taken a novel approach to challenging the program by enlisting individual students who donβt qualify for student loan forgiveness to serve as proxies for their legal arguments. A group called the Job Creators Network Foundation is bankrolling Brown and Taylorβs challenge to the program.Oral arguments before the Supreme Court in both cases are slated for February 2023.
Straight From
Sign up for our free daily newsletter.