Sacramento Police Implement New Body Camera Placement Policy to Prevent ‘Accidental’ Shutoffs

A Black Lives Matter protester holds a candle during a demonstration on March 23, 2018 in Sacramento, California
A Black Lives Matter protester holds a candle during a demonstration on March 23, 2018 in Sacramento, California
Photo: Justin Sullivan (Getty Images)

In the early morning hours of Thursday, Sept. 6, 19-year-old Darell Richards was shot and killed by a SWAT officer with the Sacramento Police Department. The officers claimed Richards had pointed a weapon at them—a weapon that was later discovered to be a pellet gun. When the body camera footage from the officers at the scene was reviewed, police learned that the body cameras of multiple officers at the scene—including one of the SWAT officers who fired shots at Richards—had been turned off.

Advertisement

Supposedly, the cameras may have “accidentally” been turned off when the butt of the rifles they were aiming inadvertently hit the button on the body camera. To prevent this from happening in the future, the department has implemented a new policy on where the cameras should now be placed.

Advertisement

Sacramento Police Department spokesman Vance Chandler told the Sacramento Bee, “They’re putting them now in a place where the stock of their weapon is less likely to hit the button to turn them off.”

Officers previously wore the cameras in the center of their chest. Civil Rights attorney John Burris—who is representing Richards’ family—told the Bee that he has never heard of an officer’s weapon turning off a body camera.

“There should not be a situation where typically the best evidence in a case is neutralized because of the video camera’s contact with the weapon,” Burris said. “It should never happen.”

Chandler told the Bee that other police departments who buy their body cameras from the same company, Axon, have reported similar issues.

Advertisement

The Richards family has filed a claim against the city, which indicates they are likely to follow with a federal civil rights lawsuit.

At a press conference on Monday, family members and members of Black Lives Matter Sacramento criticized the department for the “accidental” camera shutdowns and demanded that charges be pressed against the officers involved and that the names of those officers be released.

Advertisement

As with the officers who shot and killed Stephon Clark in March, the department is not releasing the names of the officers involved in the Richards shooting because they claim there have been threats made against their lives.

Video of the incident that was released to the public did not include any footage of Richards pointing the pellet gun at officers.

Advertisement

Chandler told the Bee that the police investigation into the shooting is ongoing. 

News Editor for The Root. I said what I said. Period.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

hollyghost
Brooklyn_Bruin

There are the people.

There are the voters.

There is the city government.

There are the cops.

Then there is us (black folks) and anyone else who’s currently othered. (Latinos typically and Muslims for a bit. Occasionally you’ll get a dark skinned Indian man tackled because he was mistaken for black, or Chinese nationals buying up all the luxury goods to make a killing at home.)

Whenever I read about the city putting restraints on the cops to ostensibly kill us less - I wonder at lot about The Voters and The People.

The voters typically don’t vote for these “handcuffs” on the cops. Remember, Cali voted for 3 Strikes way back when. Even in “progressive” places, the Oscar Grants will be in the news cycle for a hot second, before they start talking about the push to replace all plastic straws with biodegradable bamboo ones.

But the people of Sacramento? St. Louis? Los Angeles? NYC? - A death squad that can be summoned with 3 numbers on a mobile phone to address anything a “citizen” feels about others is what the general population WANTS.

And you can tell that’s what they want, because there are other places where the police are not armed, where they aren’t given statutory protection for killing.

These ideas - not arming cops, not letting them have legislative armor against state sanctioned murder - are NOT on the table ANYWHERE. Bernie ain’t talking bout it. Ocasio-Cortez ain’t talking bout it. Shelly and Barry never even considered it.

Y’all got to realize that they don’t want to take “dial a death” off of the table.

Not in Sacramento, not in California, not in the United States. The fact that black and brown folks are killed in disproportionate numbers of their population is PART OF THE BEAUTY OF THEIR SYSTEM.

It’s regrettable to them in the moment, mostly because of the press and some icky feelings about inconvenient truths, but all in all, violence against “undesirables” is a necessary part of their system.