Oprah Is Wrong About ‘Precious'

But you still need to go see Lee Daniels’ brilliant, powerful new film about a Harlem black girl in trouble.

  • | Posted: November 6, 2009 at 12:47 PM
IMDb
Why Oprah Is Wrong About 'Precious'
But you still need to go see Lee Daniels’ brilliant, powerful new film about a Harlem black girl in trouble.

But you still need to go see Lee Daniels’ brilliant, powerful new film about a Harlem black girl in trouble.

<p>But you still need to go see Lee Daniels’ brilliant, powerful new film about a Harlem black girl in trouble.</p>

Inner-city girl, inner-city school, talented teacher. You may think you’ve seen this story before. You may think you’ve heard this story before. You haven’t. As Toni Morrison once noted, she wrote the The Bluest Eye to give voice to the interior lives of black girls. The eponymous subject of Precious: Based On the Novel by Sapphire is so outside the margins, to many folks, she doesn’t register as human: She’s fat, female and black, and for many, she doesn’t exist, except as an object of pity or scorn. And the genius of this movie is that it makes you feel with her, through her.

There is hype and there is Hype, and the hoopla surrounding Precious is Hype triple-squared, exclamation point. There have been cover stories and over-the-top Oprah promos and much to-do over the makeovers and make-unders of the film’s stars. (Mariah! Mo’Nique! Lenny!) A film with this much advance pub is bound to disappoint, done under by the weight of so much expectation and promise.

And yet, it doesn’t. Noamount of hype can prepare you for the visceral shock that you get from watching this film. Precious is that powerful. It’s also brutal, bitter, painful, and, at times, really hard to take. It’s got a lot of a lot: A lot of urban pathology, a lot of sadness and grief and a whole lot of rage and venom and jaw-dropping cruelty. It’s also a thing of beauty, aural, visual, spiritual, beauty found in the most unlikely of places. In director Lee Daniels’ hands, even a pot of pig’s feet simmering on the stove becomes poetry. As does the life of a morbidly obese black girl in Harlem.

As the title suggests—awkwardly—Precious is indeed based on Push, the 1996 novel by Sapphire, in which an illiterate 16-year-old (stunning newcomer Gabourey Sidibe) finds herself pregnant by her father. Again. The incestuous father is long gone, but the mother, Mary, is still around, a malevolent presence in her daughter’s life, bullying from her perch in front of the TV, spewing a constant stream of invective: “You’re a dummy. Don’t nobody want you; don’t nobody need you.” Whenever Mary (Mo’Nique) deigns to get up from the couch—which isn’t often—it is to wield a frying pan upside Precious’ head.

There isn’t much hope for Precious: When she’s not being abused by her mother, she’s being taunted by the boys on the streets. Food is her only comfort. She’s so beaten down that she can’t recognize friendship, batting it away when it is offered to her in the guise of the little neighborhood girl who’s always pestering her. Precious can’t see her, so caught up is she in her own pain. But when she’s offered a chance at attending an alternative school taught by a compassionate but demanding teacher (Paula Patton), she slowly, ever so slowly, begins to see the love that surrounds her. She allows herself to hope. And with hope, comes a chance at some sort of redemption.

“Every day I tell myself, something gon’ happen,” she muses to herself. “I’m going to break through, or someone’s going to break through to me … someday.”

This is a film about metaphysical need, DNA-deep, adolescent-sized, existential longing and the power of popular culture to—temporarily—transform unspeakable realities into BET fantasies. (This is BET circa 1987, folks, glamorous and glitzy, years before the era of booty-shaking video vixens.)

“I want to be on the cover of a magazine,” Precious says in a voiceover. “I wish I had a light-skinned boyfriend with real nice hair. But first, I wanna be in one of them BET videos.”

Precious escapes the depravity of her world through vivid flights of fancy: In the midst of a rape, the ceiling above her melts and morphs into the aforementioned video music shoot, where she is the star, posing and preening. Pictures in photo albums talk to her, cooing reassuringly; Precious and her mother replace the characters in an old Sophia Loren movie—speaking in Italian. She looks in the mirror and sees a pretty white girl with long blonde hair. In this other universe, all is well, and Precious is wanted, loved, cherished.

Daniels (Monster’s Ball, Shadowboxer) films the action through a gauzy, sepia-toned haze, as if looking back on the past, telling her story through flashbacks, daydreams and voiceovers read from Precious’ diary. The effect is arresting, but without the powerhouse performances of his actors, it could easily be an empty exercise in filmmaking pyrotechnics. But Daniels has a real talent for pulling performances-of-a-lifetime out of his actors. As a producer, he cast Halle Berry in Monster’s Ball, winning her an Oscar. He grabs the unlikely—Mariah Carey, Lenny Kravitz, Mo’Nique—and encourages them to subsume their personas in service to the character. They’re all unrecognizable in their roles, and not because Carey decided to forgo the lipstick. They make you believe. Mo’Nique, in particular, is a revelation: She’s all snears and sullen putdowns, greedy, grasping, nasty. But in the comedian’s hands, we recognize the humanity in the monster, without wanting to forgive her of her trespasses.

A word about all that hype: Oprah, who serves as executive producer along with Tyler Perry, has pushed the film hard, and she is to be commended for throwing her weight behind a little film. It deserves every bit of attention that it gets. But there’s something discomfiting about her declarations that “We are all Precious.” In short, she Oprah-fies Precious, rendering Precious’ fierce individuality the stuff of platitudes and Stuart Smalley moments on SNL.

No, we are not all Precious. We all get our power from the individuality of our stories. Precious stands alone. 

Teresa Wiltz is The Root’s senior culture writer. Follow her on Twitter.

  • Comments

  • 28 Comments

Pre-Christmas gift,nike air max jordan shoes,coach,gucci,lv,dg,ed hardy handbags,Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste)ugg boot,Jacket,Sent to your friends, relatives, let them feel the warmth this winter. www . coolforsale . com

I'm feeling ya... but it still makes for good entertainment, which at the end of the day what it is... entertainment and fodder for most folks. Those really seeking to understand are out there trying to do something about it.

This is a tremendous piece on a movie I am eager to see....

This is really a great stuff for sharing.keep it up .Thanks for sharing,

I have read PUSH by Sapphire and its nothing but a black pathology/anti black male screed. White liberals helped hype Sapphire's book, and even the writing leaves much to be desired. PUSH should be considered gangsta lit, although not as creative.

In saying we are not all "Precious" I don't think anyone was talking about the word precious, we were referring to the character "Precious" in the film. That's what I was talking about at any rate.

Oprah is a very considerate and generous person and I am a fan of hers but I would not go see this movie PRECIOUS if you paid me !

My guess is that it is the same old sterotypical tale about sorry black folks .

I don't want to see that anymore .

It is time for uplifting shows about black folks !

Hello !!!

I suggest everyone read the novel, Push, by Sapphire,

Re: "Food is her only comfort." NOT SO.

In the novel, Mary Jones gorges Precious with food. It's believed that that was Mary's way of making her daughter sexually unattractive to her father. That was part of her trauma. This was only hinted at in the film. There is a scene in the movie where Mary insists Precious eat the meal Precious had cooked for her mother. In another scene, Precious has to stoop to trickery just to get a meal to eat...more typical of finding food for survival rather than comfort.

No, Precious is not known to find comfort in food.

Re: "No. We are not all Precious." BUT WE ARE.

Claireece decided to call herself "Precious," when she was a young girl because she thought she was just that. There is power in the notion that Claireece can find esteem and identity in renaming herself.

Each of us is given the gift of life, made precious in His name. What is so troubling about "invisible," "maligned," and "downtrodden" black girls being embraced with the label "precious?" Each and every one of us is precious. The trouble is too many of us don't recognize that.

It is not unusual for the traumatized person (Oprah) to rehash and rehash this type of story. It confirms her success in overcoming such a life and tells it again to help to heal. However, I am with the folks here who say how many times must this story be retold? I call it the "I Know Why the Caged Bird Keeps Angela's Ashes on the Bottom of Its Cage" story with no dissrespect intended. Such traumatic stories are all around us and inside many of us. Watching it to some is like watching a trainwreck that you can't look away from; others find bits of their story in it and have hope/healing experiences. But the root of the problem - the huge problem of child abuse, incest, rape and its consequences in all US sociological categories remains. As you can tell, my approach to problems is yes, we know about this but what are we going to do about it. I suspect that Oprah loves this story because for her it is but for the grace of God it could have been me. But, how many young girls will not see this movie wherever they live and continue to be trapped in Precious' type of story unless people in the community are moved to act?

The true measure of a person's wealth is the good he or she does in the world... in that sense Oprah is a very wealthy woman. She has done so much for so many people. From the U.S. to Africa... she should be celebrated... not criticized. Maybe i'm biased because she's from my hometown.