The GOP Plays 3-Card Monte With Our Vote
Hopefully the high court won't strike a measure that reins in Virginia's racial redistricting plan.
(The Root) -- If ever there were a reason to be grateful that the Voting Rights Act is still in effect, it's the shenanigans that have been taking place in Virginia's Republican-controlled state Senate. What GOP legislators have been trying to do there gives wacko racist reactionaries a bad name. If the most important provision in the act, which targets states that historically discriminated, were to be invalidated -- as may happen this summer as a result of a case that will be argued before the Supreme Court in February -- these rascals would have a far better chance of getting away with their dastardly deeds.
Even the timing of the stunt underscores the extent to which Virginia Republicans cannot be trusted. They picked Jan. 21 -- which happened to be not only the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday but also the date of Barack Obama's second inaugural -- to ram through a redistricting plan that would guarantee GOP control of the 40-member body.
It's no coincidence that the vote was taken while Henry Marsh, one of the state's five black senators, was in Washington for the inaugural ceremony. His absence gave the Republicans a temporary 20-19 majority in the evenly divided upper house of the legislature, and they took full advantage of it.
Hang on; this gets complicated. The new map would abolish the seat held by a white Democrat and replace it with a new majority-black district on the state's south side. That sounds good, but it's really another case of political three-card monte. The feat would be accomplished by consolidating black voters (who, as in other states, are mostly Democratic) into the new district, leaving more concentrated, predominantly white GOP voting blocs in other jurisdictions.
The end result, according to an analysis by respected political blogger Ben Trippett, would be the creation of a new 27-13 Republican state Senate majority. That, combined with the GOP's big advantage in the heavily gerrymandered House of Delegates, would allow Republicans to override any veto that a future Democratic governor of Virginia might issue.
Amazingly, some black members of the lower house of the legislature may actually fall for the okey-doke. One of them, Delegate Rosalyn R. Dance of Petersburg, told the Washington Post, "It's going to be hard for us [to vote against the plan] as African Americans because they create a minority seat."
To which state Sen. L. Louise Lucas of Portsmith retorted, "I'm hot as a pot of fish grease about this. I'm hoping that they're not going to be so naive as to bite that bait." The matter could come to a head next Wednesday, when the House of Delegates is set to vote on the plan.
It gets worse. In addition to rigging the state Senate, some Republicans are pushing a change in the way Virginia's electoral votes are awarded in presidential elections. Instead of delivering all 13 electoral votes to the candidate who finishes first in the popular vote, as the current winner-take-all system requires, they would award one vote to the victor in each congressional district in the state and two votes to the statewide winner.
Eight of Virginia's 11 congressional seats are GOP-controlled. Mitt Romney outpolled Obama in seven of those jurisdictions. Thus, if the scheme had been in effect during last November's elections, Romney would have wound up with nine of Virginia's electoral votes and Obama with only four, even though Obama carried the state by a convincing 51 percent-to-47 percent margin.
That attempt to undermine the principles of one person, one vote and majority rule was so blatant that even many Republicans recoiled, and the proposal was allowed to quietly die in committee. But rest assured that the diehard Republicans will resurrect it sooner or later.