5 Ways the Election Changed Politics
The midterms were not just about beating down the Democrats. Some of the results that will affect us for years didn't get much discussion.
1. A Power Shift That Will Last a Decade
There's often too much hype surrounding midterm elections, but there's never enough hype to cover a midterm election that happens right before state legislatures throughout the country take on the task of redistricting. As the U.S. Census Bureau completes its once-in-a-decade count, state legislatures will pull out their maps at the start of 2011 and reallocate voters among congressional districts. A series of decisions by the Supreme Court, beginning with Shaw v. Reno in 1993, has limited the ability of legislatures to create districts that enable minority groups to maximize their capacity to elect candidates of their choice. At the same time, the court has essentially ensured that drawing districts to maximize political interests is virtually unfettered.
Republican pickups in state legislatures throughout the country and in the governor's mansions in Florida, Ohio, Indiana and Pennsylvania means that redistricting will be firmly in the hands of the GOP-controlled redistricting committees and in the stroke of Republican governors' pens. Even now, complex computer programs in state houses throughout the country are processing raw census data and beginning to map out congressional districts by population.
Congressional elections in 2012 will take place based on the newly configured congressional districts that will be adopted by state legislatures. Thus, even if President Obama wins re-election in 2012, he may be facing an even more Republican Congress than today. Democratic and minority voters should now shift their political attention to the redistricting process. In states that are covered by Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act (mostly in the Deep South, but also several boroughs of New York City), redistricting plans will have to be submitted to and pre-cleared by the Department of Justice to ensure that they do not reduce existing levels of minority voting strength. This process requires input not only from political leaders but also from community groups and local activists, who can provide on-the-ground information about the political reality in covered jurisdictions.
2. A Return to the All-White Senate
When Rod Blagojevich, the now-convicted former governor of Illinois, decided to shank Democratic leadership in Illinois and in the White House by giving President Obama's former U.S. Senate seat to Roland Burris, many said, "Well, at least the Senate still has a black member." But from that first freak-show press conference in which Burris was introduced, it was clear that the new junior senator from Illinois, whose personally prepared memorial lists his every accomplishment, would never keep the Senate seat. President Obama's choice of Sen. Ken Salazar (D-Colo.) as secretary of the interior ensured that without Burris, the Senate would revert to being a body of white millionaires. Burris decided not to run for the seat after it became clear he couldn't raise money. Now the seat has been won by Republican Mark Kirk.
As professor Terry Smith has explained in a fascinating essay, Tea Party calls for a repeal of the 17th Amendment, which provides for the direct election of senators by the people, are a reminder that concerns about race and "states' rights" have long figured into considerations about how we elect our senators. But it's an astonishing reality that in the 21st century, the U.S. Senate remains the last bastion of all-white elected leadership.