On Tattoos and Taste
This writer celebrates most ink, but here's why Chad Johnson and Chris Brown crossed a line.
(The Root) -- I'm actually a pretty big fan of tattoos. I've dated more than a few guys with them. I have one. I even tried to convince my mom to get one once, but she politely declined. Said it wouldn't go with her age.
Tattoos can be spiritual. They can, as in the case of Rihanna's latest ink in honor of her grandmother who passed away, indelibly mark the spot where someone touched your life, like the big "X" on a treasure map. Or they can be rooted in nothing save a spontaneous decision made in one's youth. In either extreme, I'm a fan.
What I'm not a big fan of, ever, are micro-aggressive tattoos, a term I've just invented that so far has two possible celebrity poster boys: Chris Brown and Chad "Ochocinco" Johnson. Recently both men permanently inked themselves with the faces (or, in Chris Brown's case, the likeness) of women whom they've abused physically.
Johnson's estranged wife, reality star Evelyn Lozada, filed for divorce in August after a domestic violence incident in which Johnson head-butted Lozada after an argument. Last week he posted pictures of a large tattoo of what appears to be Lozada's face covering most of his right calf. Underneath the portrait of Lozada reads "Eve," making the connection even clearer.
There's no word yet how the soon-to-be-former Mrs. Johnson feels about the ink on her abuser's leg, but I would guess that she's less than honored. According to reports, she's still moving forward with the divorce. She told ABC's Nightline, "It's the hardest thing in the world to walk away from someone that you really love. But you have to walk away because I have to protect myself."
When one of Johnson's Twitter followers asked, perhaps rhetorically, why the football player would get a tattoo of Lozada post-divorce, he replied almost flippantly, "Divorce? Child please," and "That's my WIFE." According to reports, Johnson still refuses to sign the divorce papers filed by Lozada. Florida is a no-fault divorce state, meaning that either spouse can prove that the marriage is "irretrievably broken."
What more, then, is Johnson's recent tattoo than some twisted form of protest? But protest against what? Domestic abuse? Divorce? Common sense?