About 
2012
Print
EmailYou know, I hate being right so much of the time. Actually I don't, but as regular readers of this blog and my own personal joint [25] know, I have a talent for clairvoyance. So, not long after I told CNN's Kiran Chetry that Debbie Rowe would almost certainly throw her hat into the ring ...
... she goes on the radio and says that she wil [26]l fight for her kids. It's as if she was taking my advice, right? [27]
Jackson's parents may have bankruptcy issues that preculde them from taking custody [27] and I'm on record asI'm definitely rolling with Team Rowe. Not that it's easy to roll with her, because not for nothing, she was basically a Rent-A-Womb: a friend of Michael Jackson who said she'd carry babies for him. He bought her off, but I don't know that there is any way to actually terminate rights to a biological child. I mean, if you lose your dog and someone else takes him in, if you put an ID chip under his skin, then it's you'll be taking your dog back home. It's a coarse analogy, I know. But your kids are yours forever... It's not as if she was just a surrogate -- the children may be hers biologically. From the curb, it looks like a sticky legal wicket that won't go away anytime soon. She's kind of the Billie Jean [28] of Bizzaro World, [29] taking on Michael Jackson's family for the rights to her kids. What do you think?
Should Debbie Rowe take custody of the Jackson children?
Comments