Fresh from our "Pot calling the kettle black" file, former disgraced O.J. Simpson trial-of-the-century prosecutor turned television analyst Marcia Clark is speaking out about the Casey Anthony trial. Her verdict: It was worse than O.J. because Casey Anthony wasn't a celebrity and there were no racial issues. Really? Many black women we talked to feel that if we had been on trial for the same crime with the same evidence, there would have sho' nuff been a conviction.
A young, sobbing white woman looking like a deer caught in headlights, with her family's unyielding support — even while accusing her supportive father of sexual abuse and implicating him in the crime — doesn't play toward the sympathy of a jury (tongue planted squarely in cheek).
But OK, race played no role in this verdict (voluntary eye roll).
It is interesting that someone like Clark, who blew a case with much more evidence than in this case, is an "expert" on trials of this sort. But hey, if Mark Fuhrman can be an television expert on crime despite his, shall we say, "colorful" past, then why not Clark? Check out what she has to say about the verdict in an excerpt from her op-ed on the Daily Beast below:
Sick, shaken, in disbelief. As I listened to the verdicts in the Casey Anthony case, acquitting her of the homicide of her baby girl, I relived what I felt back when court clerk Deirdre Robertson read the verdicts in the Simpson case.
But this case is different. The verdict is far more shocking. Why?
Because Casey Anthony was no celebrity. She never wowed the nation with her athletic prowess, shilled in countless car commercials, or entertained in film comedies. There were no racial issues, no violent Rodney King citywide riot just two years earlier.
Because of those factors, many predicted from the very start in the Simpson case — in fact, long before we even began to pick a jury — that it would be impossible to secure a conviction.
There was no such foreshadowing here, and few who predicted that a jury might completely acquit Casey Anthony of the killing of her daughter.
The trial itself, despite bumps and turns, never introduced any unexpected bombshells that blew up in the prosecution’s face (à la detective Mark Fuhrman's racially charged interview tapes with a novelist). All things considered, it went pretty smoothly. Judge Belvin Perry was fantastic — a model of even-tempered, no-nonsense control who kept the flow of evidence orderly and succinct, and who never let the lawyers run amok. He even jailed and fined a spectator for acting up in court.
So there was no racist cop, no questions about evidence collection, and no endless cross-examination on irrelevancies like Columbian necklaces and drug cartels. And while there was significant media coverage before the trial, it didn't come close to the storm that permeated the Simpson case for months prior to jury selection …
Source: the Daily Beast.
In other news: Congo Rape Victims Suffer Retaliatory Attacks.