Debate Results: McCain Down, White Women Up
Why Obama's cool debate strategy played to his toughest group of hold-outs.
Sept. 29, 2008--The Sarah Palin Effect is over. Palin and McCain joined forces last week to make sure that no one took them very seriously, and they did every thing they could to help Obama open up a small but increasingly solid lead on McCain. With the Palin bump neutralized, Obama's still nagging concern are those Hillary voters who seemed determined to only look back in anger.
According to a recent Gallup Poll, John McCain's advantage over Barack Obama among white women is down to a measly two percentage points, 47 percent to 45 percent. That's down from an 11 point lead with the group in the days after the Republican Convention, at the height of the Palin frenzy. Everything seems to have changed in the last week. Maybe it was McCain suspension dynamics, or maybe it was Palin's conversation with Katie Couric. But white women, who campaign commercials and pundits insisted were shifting to McCain in droves, have evidently stopped shifting.
That is, except for white, college-educated women between 30 and 49.
The one area where Obama still seems to be struggling is not with the now-famous working-class, blue-collar female voter or women over 50 who provided Clinton with her most stalwart support. No, for now, the most skeptical hold-outs seem to be college graduates between 30 and 49. Go figure.
Obama has a huge lead among white women under 30 who have been to college, leading by 19 points in the most recent Gallup Poll. Among non-college white women, McCain has a five- point lead. Among women over 50, the candidates are playing to their strengths, with those who have been to college favoring Obama by an average of 13 percentage points, while those who have not been to college are going to McCain by the same margin.
It is the white college-educated women between 30 and 49 that jumble the picture; they favor Obama by a mere six points between 30 and 39, and three points between 40 and 49. Consider this the grudge match; some of these women were not just for Hillary, they were against Obama. They didn't trust him, thought he was too smooth, too lucky, that he was undeserving of the attention and the acclaim. They think they know this guy. They have worked with him, maybe dated him. They commute to work still stewing about him, and they are not yet ready to let it go.
Which brings me to the Friday debate, and why Obama's excessively agreeable approach was the only way to go: The only people left to convince are those looking at stylistic questions. For the most part they are women, white women. Despite McCain's refusal to even look at him, Obama's decision to treat the debate like a conversation , conceding small points in order to make larger ones, probably played well with these undecideds. Hence, his surge to an eight-point lead with white women in the Gallup Daily Tracking Poll. I'm guessing that it continues to rise over the next couple of days.
Apparently, the closer you were to the presidential debate of Friday, the harder it was to see what happened. According to hyper-prolific Ben Smith at Politico, the consensus in the press filing room in Oxford, Miss. was that McCain had won. He admits that it was a 'mild' consensus meaning that it came with a 'feel free to disregard' warning, and he offered this tidbit only to say that the quickie polls disagreed.
A CBS news poll showed that viewers thought Obama won 39 percent to 25 percent, while another, conducted by CNN, showed a 51 percent to 38 percent margin for Obama. That poll is being discounted in some circles because the sample was more Democratic than the population at large, but that has been the trend. Democrats enjoy a remarkable registration advantage over the GOP. Given John McCain's performance in the last few days – suspending his campaign, showing up on Capitol Hill just in time to blow up the Wall Street bailout deal, working from home over the weekend—the margin may only grow larger.
Hardcore Obama supporters may have wanted their candidate to jab harder on Friday. But Obama knew what crowd he needed to play to. The few undecided voters left are not cheered when they see the candidates fight; they are the ones decrying negative ads, and so all that congeniality probably worked for Obama. McCain, at one point on Friday, accused Obama of not knowing the difference between tactics and strategy; the immediate verdicts on the debate tell a different story, and we'll know more when we see where white women come down in the end.
Terence Samuel is deputy editor of The Root.
Also on The Root:
Terence Samuel slaughters the pig, Sam Fulwood settles the score and Jack White makes a debatable decision.
Discuss:
Debate Results: McCain Down, White Women Up
Member Comments
-
Posted By:
-
Posted By:
-
Posted By:
View All Comments »whitey17 at 10/25/2008 7:38:46 PM
Comment:
Redistribution of Wealth
Today on my way to lunch I passed a homeless guy with a sign that read "
Vote Obama, I need the money." I laughed.
Once in the restaurant my server had on a "Obama 08" tie. Again I laughed,
as he had given away his political preference--just imagine the
coincidence.
When the bill came I decided not to tip the server and explained to him
that I was exploring the Obama redistribution of wealth concept. He stood
there in disbelief while I told him that I was going to redistribute his
tip to someone who I deemed more in need--the homeless guy outside. The
server angrily stormed from my sight.
I went outside, gave the homeless guy $10 and told him to thank the server
inside as I've decided he could use the money more. The homeless guy was
grateful.
At the end of my rather unscientific redistribution experiment I realized
the homeless guy was grateful for the money he did not earn, but the waiter
was pretty angry that I gave away the money he did earn even though the
actual recipient deserved money more.
I guess redistribution of wealth is an easier thing to swallow in concept
than in practical application.
OR IS IT.........REDISTRIBUTION OF SOMEONE ELSE'S WEALTH IS A GREAT IDEA?
Obama and his socialist friends have raised more money in the history of contributions on any presidential campaign ever! I heard around 350 million dollars???. Well, maybe he should have redistributed that money??? It certainly would have gone a long way? But, then that was his money and he just wants to give your money away!
kewlan at 10/06/2008 2:33:29 PM
Comment:
Talk to them about it Peace , keep it real it not about us it is about God. And without Him we wouldn't or can't be anything. That is the problem we all think it is about man adorning ourselves with vanity, pride, money, and what so and so did or said in years past. We look back instead of forward; worshipping and praising that which does nothing, nor cares for us.
Then we fail to realize nothing happens without God's say so and stamp of approval so no matter what we all say and who we vote for will be decided by the only One who has all power.
barbara at 10/06/2008 1:29:12 PM
Comment:
Obama has NOT stayed true to his word and is only saying what it takes to get him in office. I feell sorry that you feel that way because you have not really looked into his background it seems. We are in trouble if people think like you. You need to have a good read - try his books - ha ha ha ha!!