The Science of Racism
Having spent the past three decades studying racist discourse in the West (starting with my Ph.D. dissertation on the Enlightenment), I know that such conclusions—say, about an entity called "Jewish intelligence"—would deleteriously affect me as a black person because it would reinforce stereotypes about Jewish people being genetically superior to us, and that such a conclusion would reinforce stereotypes about black people being inherently less intelligent than other members of the human community. If such differences in intelligence were purported to have a genetic basis, as David Duke proclaimed on his Web site with such naked glee, all of the social intervention in the world could have only so much effect. (Head Start? Why bother, when nature is to blame.) Sooner or later, in a time of increasing economic scarcity, members of these supposedly "different" or "lesser" ethnic groups or genetic populations could very well find their life possibilities limited and perhaps even regulated. Who among us can doubt that this would be true?
Likewise, I worry even more that Dr. Watson confessed to me that "we shouldn't expect that different persons have equal intelligence, because we don't know that. And people say that these should be the same [that is, that all human beings, that all members of different "racial" groups, should have the same basic range and potential for development of intelligence genetically]. I think the answer is we don't know." And later, he remarked in passing that "we're not all the same," by which he meant genetically. Rest assured that in the very near future, some scientist somewhere will claim to have proven this through our genes, and that claim will be deeply problematic for the future development of black people in American society.
As I drove away from Cold Spring Harbor, I realized that my conversation with Dr. Watson only confirmed something I already, with great trepidation, have come to believe: That the last great battle over racism will be fought not over access to a lunch counter, or a hotel room, or to the right to vote, or even the right to occupy the White House; it will be fought in a laboratory, in a test tube, under a microscope, in our genome, on the battleground of our DNA. It is here where we, as a society, will rank and interpret our genetic difference.
Henry Louis Gates Jr. is editor-in-chief of The Root and is the Alphonse Fletcher University Professor at Harvard University.
Read excerpts from Q&A with Nobel laureate and DNA pioneer James Watson.
Watch portions of this conversation in video
Discuss:
The Science of Racism
Member Comments
-
Posted By:
-
Posted By:
-
Posted By:
View All Comments »JLF31972 at 11/13/2008 9:02:14 PM
Comment:
Check out the documentary "Red Clay Hills" on Youtube. Race is still a major issue in this country.
PCFactor at 08/31/2008 3:02:31 PM
Comment:
I find that Howard Gardner's theory of Multiple Intelligences more appropriately addresses differences in intelligence and is not based on race. I wonder how James Watson would argue this?
The introduction of Multiple Intelligence's allows for the fact or at least possibility that there is actually a much closer relation between people when it comes to their intelligence. Our current, or when I was in earlier school, the main system of teaching and expectations were mostly designed towards strictly Linguistic and Logical-Mathematical intelligence causing those that had learning skills more proportionate in others of the 8 multiple intelligences to perform either more poorly or have to work harder to accomplish the same as those the system was seemingly designed for. This not only contributed to a lower level of success, a higher drop out rate, but also a lower self confidence and self view in a majority of students.
PCFactor at 08/31/2008 2:56:36 PM
Comment:
How does the theory of DNA traits contributing to intelligence hold up to Howard Gardner's recognized theory of Multiple Intelligences?
The introduction of Multiple Intelligence's allows for the fact or at least possibility that there is actually a much closer relation between people when it comes to their intelligence. Our current, or when I was in earlier school, the main system of teaching and expectations were mostly designed towards strictly Linguistic and Logical-Mathematical intelligence causing those that had learning skills more proportionate in others of the 8 multiple intelligences to perform either more poorly or have to work harder to accomplish the same as those the system was seemingly designed for. This not only contributed to a lower level of success, a higher drop out rate, but also a lower self confidence and self view in a majority of students.