Dear Gov. Dean: Are You Ready to Lead?
There's still time for you to save the Democratic Party.
May 7, 2008
Dear Gov. Dean,
Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are not tied. You know this. There is little chance of a gracious settlement offer from the Clinton camp. The slim margin in Indiana gives her just enough rationale to stay in it.
Given that she will not voluntarily withdraw, Mr. Dean, I am asking you to take a hard look at the Democratic Party and consider whether you want that party to have a future. If so, now is the time for leadership.
The broad and powerful Democratic coalition of the New Deal no longer exists. By and large, southern whites have joined with Republicans. White ethnic Catholics exit in greater numbers each election. Labor union households are still Democrats, but their numbers and influence are declining. Although the 1990s saw a two-term Democratic president, he had such short coattails that the party lost its 40-year majority in the House within 24 months of his inauguration. In short, the party is in trouble. If it is to have a future, Democrats must forge new coalitions.
The party must shore up its strengths. African-Americans are the most consistently loyal Democratic partisans in national and local elections. But the tie between blacks and the Democratic Party does not bind as fiercely as it once did. There has been a notable decline among blacks who call themselves Strong Democrats and a substantial increase in African-Americans who identify as Independents. Also, far fewer black Americans now believe that there are clear differences between the parties. If you don't believe me, just ask my Republican colleague Jeff Grynaviski, from the University of Chicago. He and I researched these trends together and he has no horse in this race. He will tell you that these are the same patterns that occurred among white southeners and Catholics before they started shopping for a new party.
Mr. Dean, if you allow Senator Clinton to take the party's nomination after ruthlessly deploying race in this primary campaign, you will obliterate your base. Despite all the media chatter about white, working class voters, the candidate with a demographic problem is Hillary Clinton, not Barack Obama. Obama has developed a national, multiracial coalition, and his vote share among white voters has remained largely consistent throughout the campaign. Just look how well he did last night in Indiana. Hillary Clinton has gone from the favored candidate among black voters in early opinion polls to a candidate who has been repudiated by 92 percent of those voters, a fact proven last night in North Carolina.
Let's be clear. When black folks switch parties, we do it decisively. After nearly a century of unwavering commitment to the party of Lincoln, it was Republican Barry Goldwater's presidential bid in 1964, designed to appeal to entrenched American racism, which led to an increase in black Democratic Party identifiers from 59 percent to 86 percent in a single election. Despite Obama's call for unity in his North Carolina victory speech last night, black Americans will not stand behind a candidate who deploys a Goldwater strategy within our own party. Our opposition to the war will not allow us to vote for McCain, but we can choose to exit the coalition, withhold our votes, to protest a Clinton candidacy. This is not a threat. It is an observation based on historical evidence.
Democrats need a new coalition, and they must build that coalition on the foundation of African-American voters. But that is not enough. Last night, Barack Obama won North Carolina with the same coalition that elected John Edwards to the U.S. Senate in 1998: African-Americans, laboring whites, progressive intellectuals and enthusiastic new voters. This is sustainable Democratic politics. Obama's wins in Iowa, Wisconsin, Washington, South Carolina, Mississippi and Virginia portend a new future.
That future is dependent on a new generation of voters. Hillary Clinton's candidacy is indelibly tied to a generation that came of age in Jim Crow, cut their teeth on Vietnam, and have governed the country with bitter partisan division. Obama's core supporters, like their candidate, represent a generation prepared to seek new solutions, new allies, and new trajectories for the country. Obama is the candidate of youth, but youth in this election does not mean just kids. Obama's supporters are taxpaying, military-serving, home-owning grown-ups. Youth, in this campaign, is the same youth that Bobby Kennedy spoke of at the University of Capetown in South Africa in 1966. Bobby Kennedy told us:
"Our answer is the world's hope; it is to rely on youth. The cruelties and the obstacles of this swiftly changing planet will not yield to obsolete dogmas and outworn slogans. It cannot be moved by those who cling to a present, which is already dying, who prefer the illusion of security to the excitement and danger, which comes with even the most peaceful progress. This world demands the qualities of youth: not a time of life but a state of mind, a temper of the will, a quality of the imagination, a predominance of courage over timidity, of the appetite for adventure over the love of ease."
Clinton's camp will argue that she is the candidate of the party's blue-collar base. This is an unsupportable argument. The demographics that Clinton attracts in the primaries are demographics dominated by GOP voters in the general election. She will not be the choice of the working class, white men, and senior voters. John McCain will be.
Mr. Dean, the Democratic coalition isn't the only one that is fragile right now. There are important segments of the Republican coalition who are uncomfortable with the social conservatism and war mongering of the recent Bush administration. They are ripe for realignment; but they are deeply suspicious of the Clintons. They need a reason to jump ship. Obama offers them one.
Mr. Dean, now is the time for courage. Your party has chosen a nominee, and he is a capable of creating and shoring up a new and lasting Democratic majority built on a national, multiracial, intergenerational coalition of men and women. Last night Senator Obama said, "I love this country too much to see it divided and distracted at this moment in our history."
Mr. Dean, how much do you love your party? It is time to start making the call, publicly and privately, for Hillary Clinton to exit the race. Your party needs you. Are you prepared to lead?
Sincerely,
Melissa
Melissa Harris -Lacewell is associate professor of politics and African American studies at Princeton University.
Also on The Root: Melissa Harris-Lacewell's "Losing Pennsylvania, Sorely!", "Wright Prophet, Wrong Direction", and "How the Bronx Turned Green".
Discuss:
Dear Gov. Dean: Are You Ready to Lead?
Member Comments
-
Posted By:
-
Posted By:
-
Posted By:
View All Comments »jhncrsp at 05/14/2008 5:49:34 PM
Comment:
As a Black supporter of Hillary Clinton, I am absolutely livid that the Obama campaign, after having directed a steady stream of bogus "racism" charges at the Clintons ever since South Carolina, now has the absolute audacity, the pure, unmitigated gall, to now condescend to have Hillary stay in the race "as long as she doesn't attack Obama". Well, as a committed supporter of Hillary, I say that she should come out swinging and keep swinging until she either: 1) wins the nomination, or 2) damages him so badly that he won't be able to get elected dogcatcher! And Blacks, who just plain, flat-out kicked Hillary to the curb as soon some still damned near wholly unknown Black man with a smooth line suddenly popped out of nowhere, ought to be ASHAMED of themselves for so ruthlessly abandoning old friends. YOU ARE BEING USED! BIG TIME! No one still really knows a damned thing about this guy, except what we've been spoon-fed by his campaign. But, again, I'm telling you right now that we are being used - by those with an agenda who put an attractive Black face out front. And I'm telling you that that agenda does not necessarily correspond to Black interests. Disregard Obama for a moment - he's just the puppet. Black folks, think for one moment. WHO ARE THE PUPPET MASTERS BEHIND THIS GUY? What, precisely, is THEIR agenda? You think he's doing all of this on his own? You fools! Think again. JUST WHO IS THIS GUY? Since he's not been vetted AT ALL, just what does he really believe? Bottom line, JUST WHO THE HELL IS THIS GUY FRONTING FOR? It's someone, believe that, but who? Don't be stupid. Think! Just who are the powers behind this guy, and what do THEY want? Forget him! What do THEY want?
lj55 at 05/14/2008 4:14:10 AM
Comment:
Hey, thanks for your open-minded thoughts (not one of which is backed up by ANY evidence or facts).
It is because of attitudes like yours that many of Hillary Clinton's supporters (and all those blue-collar, working class voters ACROSS THE COUNTRY) don't support Obama; just like they didn't support Michael Dukakis, Walter Mondale, Al Gore or John Kerry - although they came close for Al Gore.
You don't seem to get it that MOST of the voting populace in this country is a) blue-collar working class; b) over 45; c) Catholic or Jewish; d) lives outside of "urbia"; and e) does not have a college degree.
Obama's "coalition" is mostly smoke and mirrors (maybe with a good dollop of hopin' and wishin' sprinkled on for good measure).
You might want to review Andrew Kohut's latest opinion survey findings before you start 'dissin every major voting group in the country.
Finally, I used to find Barack Obama intriguing. I considered supporting him early on because I thought he might be different. He's not. He has mastered the art of slash and burn politics; in addition to being unqualified, he is deceptive, arrogant, rude, racist, sexist, has used right-wing talking points in his "stealth" campaign against Hillary Clinton, has pulled the race card each and every time he has faced a real challenge in the primaries - all the way back to New Hampshire.
His surrogates and followers are the most narrow-minded, rude, crass, obnoxious, toxic, juvenile, ill-mannered morons I have ever had the privilege to be exposed to in politics - and I've been a Democratic Party activist for 35 years. His supporters swarmed my caucus: they basically overran it; they intimidated voters; verbally trashed Hillary Clinton; tossed Clinton literature; pulled down Clinton signs; forced their way into precincts where they were not even registered or living; engaged in name-calling, innuendo, and sexism; and called Clinton and her supporters vulgar and inappropriate names.
From what I've seen, Obama's "devotees" are nothing short of a cult and more like storm troopers. Try spending any time in the o-godosphere to get even a hint of this behavior.
And your attitude is narrow-minded, bigoted, exclusive, dismissive, derisive, childish, and dangerous.
Yeah. The party's in trouble alright. But it's far from Hillary Clinton's fault.
lj55 at 05/14/2008 3:57:35 AM
Comment:
Last time I checked blue-collar working class Democrats, union members, women, and seniors comprised a FAR GREATER SHARE of the voters than young, upscale, urban, "creative class", "educated" (Hey! So am I!) voters.
You might not like to face these uncomfortable facts, but truth isn't often comfortable.
While the country is indeed trending Democratic, voters 45+ DO NOT SUPPORT Barack Obama, which exit polls have shown in nearly all primary/caucus results. In addition, the "racist" whites you so snobbishly refer to have been conveniently lumped into yet another group by you and people like you to set up an "us vs. them" paradigm. I hardly call that the politics of change.
One more thing: it is because of the narrow-minded attitudes of people in Obama's camp, like you, who do great damage to the Democratic Party's value of inclusiveness, tolerance and acceptance. In fact, far from being the "coalition builder" that he wants people to believe he is, Barack Obama is as underhanded a politician as I have had the experience of seeing in my 35 years of Democratic Party activism. Through his surrogates and singularly, he has perfected the art of slash and burn politics. He has great charm, a wonderful smile, and terrific oratory, but he is no change candidate - as you will find out if he is the Democratic Party's nominee. That he completely ripped-off Hillary Clinton's economic and housing proposals, her "green" jobs talking points, and modified his health care plan from hers is despicable.
Thanks for your "educated" opinions - with little evidence or facts to back them up, but I'll pass on your race-baiting, narrow-minded, union-hating, working class hating, women-hating drivel, because it's just more of the same that is spouted and passed on by Obama's followers.
Good luck with your letter. I'm sure Howard Dean will be so impressed that you're from Princeton University...