Skip Navigation
Cancel
[ Top Five Views ]
Keith Josef Adkins

SECOND GUESSING MY PATRIOTISM

Rebecca Walker

MY SON WILL NOT STOP TALKING. It's driving me mad.

Jimi Izrael

IF YOU'RE DOING IT BIG, Sen. Barack Obama thinks you could give a little more come tax time.

Melissa Harris-Lacewell

THE 4TH OF JULY weekend is nearly here. I don't know about you, but I have mixed emotions about this holiday.

Marc Lamont Hill

AS MUCH AS I enjoy a good Obama-bash, I have to disagree with you on this one. Given your penchant for calling me idealistic and naïve about therealpolitik of presidential campaigns, I'm surprised that you're tripping about UnityFest 2008.

Veronica Chambers

SUMMER SUPPER: Soft Shell Crabs & Corn, Avocado and Tomato Salad

[ Views ]

Reagan Couldn't Win Either

Obama has nothing to prove in the age of Bush.

Getty Images
Type Size

Can Obama be elected?

Can he actually win?

Is Bill Clinton right about the Obama fairy tale?

I am sick and tired of these questions.  Yes he can! Yes we can!

Remember, a village in Texas has been missing its idiot for nearly 8 years now.  If we can elect Bush president of the United States -- not once, but twice -- then we can elect a smart, powerful, uplifting mythical figure, too!  It is now clear that a "C" student can start two wars, mess them both up, alienate the world, squander a $40 billion budget surplus and create backbreaking public debt.  And while doing so, also manage to deepen the sense of polarization and cynicism regarding politics and our public lives.

So, when I hear these demands for greater specificity from Obama, and worries that he is a more a cult figure than a man of substance, I don't know whether to laugh or to cry.  Given the magnitude of the mistakes of the recent past, it is just laughable to think that Obama will not be able to move us in a much more positive direction on the foreign policy front.  It is equally transparent to me that he can set a fundamentally different tone for political discourse and decision making. 

What makes me want to cry is the difficulty some people, including otherwise liberal public intellectuals like Paul Krugman, are having with embracing a message of hope.  It seems that some folks are so hemmed in by a comprised and falsely constrained discourse that they won't embrace what a growing number of Americans plainly see and passionately want -- that we don't have to slog through the same old politics and fights.  We don't have to remain in the mire. We don't have to go the low road. Hope is at hand.

I am old enough to remember the 1980 presidential election.  I remember all the pundits who entered that campaign thinking America was never—never, ever—going to elect a grade B movie star president of the United States.  It was only in the last two weeks before the general election that the centers of establishmentarian thinking took a hard look at the poll numbers and said, "Oh my God, Ronald Reagan may win. And in a landslide!"  The rest, as they say, is history.

At that time, Reagan represented a movement, one that had felt closed out of even Republican politics for a long time.  It was a movement that managed to capitalize on a political moment of deep frustration with the Carter years.  That electoral success changed the national political landscape for a generation to come.

Today, Obama represents a movement, a movement on the center-left that has felt closed out of even Democratic politics for a long time.  Obama can unite the Democrats, as the recent results in Maryland and in Virginia proved pretty dramatically.  Just ask the expanding ranks of low-income, white men and white women who just cast their votes for Obama, too!  Once elected, he will change the political landscape as well.  And he can take on John "100-Year-War" McCain.  It is a movement whose time has come. 

Lawrence D. Bobo is the W. E. B. Du Bois Professor of Sociology and of African and African American Studies at Harvard University. 

Discuss:

Reagan Couldn't Win Either

Member Comments

  • Posted By:
    JasonAaron at 02/21/2008 4:36:14 PM
    Comment:
    All this talk about who has the most experience is bogus. According to the US Constitution. The minimum qualifications to be president are that you be at least 35 and a US citizen. Anyone can be president and Obama has enough intelligence and vision to make us another great nation for another 8 years at least.
  • Posted By:
    blessinggirl at 02/20/2008 11:29:49 PM
    Comment:
    I agree with the conclusion of the article, but please do not compare Senator Obama to Ronald Reagan. Ronald Reagan started this "I love being white and forget the blacks and the poor" juggernaut that led us to Bush II. He truly was an empty suit, and the inspiration he provided was to white folks who were truly beaten up after losing the Vietnam war, the energy crisis, when Arabia turned America upside down and ended cheap gas, and the multiple rights movements which proliferated after the Civil Rights era. He slashed federal poverty programs and his policies created and formed the permanent underclass. He did not bring down the Soviet Union, as legend has it. Comparing Obama to him is disrespectful.
  • Posted By:
    Vermeer at 02/20/2008 10:14:40 PM
    Comment:
    This analysis misses one significant point about Ronald Reagan; he was a
    two-term governor of California riding the crest of what the historian Kevin
    Phillips recognized as "the emerging Republican majority." Obama, whose
    inspired rhetoric has galvanized some dormant but mostly frustrated members
    of that same Reagan coalition, doesn't have much to run on beside his
    profile, opposition to the Iraq War, and what appear to be some demographic
    indicators favoring the Democrats and a Republican Party in freefall. This
    electorate is highly volatile and simply wishing that everyone should come
    to their senses and choose the "hope' that is Obama is frankly naive.
    Obama's rhetoric and vague longing for change could come crashing down in
    one bad debate performance leaving the electorate looking at a qualified
    senior (geezer) senator and war hero against a rookie senator who frankly
    still can't explain his 130 + "present" votes as a state senator in
    Illinois. Honestly, after eight years of the mess of this administration the
    idea the presidential election could boil down to that is frightening. I'm a
    little bored of the echo chamber of intelligent people like yourself who
    seem to believe that electoral politics is simply some sort of calculation
    that the public is exhausted with the Bushies and some revolution is in the
    offing because someone with charisma and smarts has now ascended to the
    podium. That's a delusion just as troubling as any of those held by the
    current office-holder.

View All Comments »