Obama's Town Hall Casting Call
National Review is already questioning whether MTV plans on hand-picking liberal youths who will go easy on the president. But I'd remind the editors of two things.
A casting call went out today for Barack Obama's upcoming youth town hall. This is from Backstage.com:
PRESIDENT OBAMA TOWN HALL, MTV
MTV, BET and CMT are casting the audience for town hall meeting with President Obama. Shooting Oct. 14, 4 p.m. in Washington, D.C.
Seeking—Audience Members: males & females, 18+.
To apply, email townhallaudience@mtvnmix.com and put "Town Hall" in the subject line. To ensure that the audience represents diverse interests and political views, include your name, phone number, hometown, school attending, your job and what issues, if any, you are interested in or passionate about. Also, provide a recent photo and short description of your political views. Submission deadline: Oct. 14. No pay.
Naturally, National Review is already questioning whether MTV plans on hand-picking liberal youths who will go easy on the president. But I'd remind them of two things: 1. Young voters overwhelmingly support Democrats, meaning that, regardless of who the casting company chooses, the pool from which they'll be picking is one swimming with blue fish. If they want an accurate representation of the youth vote, they'll need pick more Democrats than Republicans. And 2. Judging by Obama's most recent town hall, during which a woman told him directly that she was "tired of defending" him and his administration, it seems safe to say that the president doesn't demand ideological parity from his audinces. In fact, I'm inclined to think the young conservatives they’ll find to pepper the crowd will probably be a bit more irreverent (read: tougher) than their older counterparts. It will be interesting to watch.
--Cord Jefferson is a staff writer at The Root. Follow him on Twitter.
Clyburn Rips Republicans, Says Black Caucus Open to Republicans
In a conference call with journalists today, House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.) harshly derided GOP leadership before vowing to work with any black Republican congressman seeking to join the Congressional Black Caucus.
In a conference call with journalists today, House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.) harshly derided GOP leadership before vowing to work with any black Republican congressman seeking to join the Congressional Black Caucus.
In a notably gloomy address, Clyburn warned of the Republicans’ Pledge to America, an ambitious legislative agenda for the next Congress that would, among other things, repeal health care reform. He said that if voters don't support Democratic candidates on Election Day, all the work of the past 20 months could be lost. "Next year we may even get the public option or the single payer," he said, referring to a fully subsidized government healthcare plan. "But we aren’t going to get there by sitting out this election and allowing people to get elected who have vowed to repeal all that we’ve done."
Ending his speech, Clyburn said that the Democrats winning on Nov. 2 was "important to future generations."
Also on the call was the vice chair of the House Democratic Caucus, Xavier Becerra, who minced words even less than the outspoken Clyburn. "When you take a look at this Republican campaign pledge," said Becerra, "it's nothing better than a two-by-four wrapped around your head."
OMB Watch, a nonprofit research organization dedicated to creating transparency in government, released a study today that supports Clyburn and Becerra's claims. Gary Bass, executive director of OMB Watch, says that, if enacted, the Pledge to America "would increase budget deficits, harm Americans still trying to recover from the recession, and bring work on crucial public protections to a grinding halt."
Despite a difference of opinion, Clyburn added that he would welcome African-American Republicans into the Congressional Black Caucus should any win in November. Currently a handful of black Republicans are running for office, though it looks as if only South Carolina's Tim Scott will win for sure. "Whoever comes to the Congress and wants to join up with the caucus, they need to make their intentions known," said Clyburn. "And if Tim Scott is interested in joining the caucus, he would be welcome."
The Congressional Black Caucus hasn't had a Republican member since Rep. Gary Franks retired in 1997. Still, Clyburn said he was close to Franks and expects he can work with Scott in a similarly affable manner. "Whether our relationship will be a formal one or functional one," he said, "all that would be up to Mr. Scott if he were successful on Nov. 2."
--Cord Jefferson is a staff writer at The Root. Follow him on Twitter.
The Benefits of Being a White Ridiculous Candidate
Christine O'Donnell was given a fair shot at winning, a shot that Alvin Greene -- her political equal -- never had.
Tea Party-movement-backed Republican Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell today released a campaign ad in which she tells Delaware voters directly, “I’m not a witch.” I’m no advertising expert, but it seems to me that if you’ve got to remind people that you’re not a witch, your problems are bigger than a 30-second spot can handle.
Besides refuting her time spent in witchery—“But not in a coven!” she asserts—O’Donnell has fessed up to decrying abortion as “adultery,” proclaiming that we should cut funding to AIDS research, implying that she has classified information about China's plans for world domination and saying that she’s not sure she would lie to Nazis to protect a Jew. Also spotty is O’Donnell’s education record, which she appears to have fudged twice—charges she denies.
Whatever you think of her religious beliefs, it seems pretty obvious that O’Donnell is unfit for major elected office. So unfit, in fact, that I can’t help comparing her with this year’s other most famous amateurish candidate: Alvin Greene.
Running in South Carolina, Greene surprised everyone back in June when he won the Democratic Senate primary and the opportunity to take on incumbent Jim DeMint. Like O’Donnell, Greene had no experience in office, a controversial back story and a propensity for saying crazy things in public. Unlike O’Donnell, however, the political machine abandoned him almost as soon as he won. The DSCC refused to put any money into his campaign, and South Carolina Democratic officials asked him to drop out of the race. Some people even accused Greene of cheating. Watching O’Donnell’s meteoric rise to fame, I’m left wondering how she’s become a major talking point on cable news a month before the election, while Greene was almost literally laughed into hiding.
Despite some initial reticence, the National Republican Senatorial Committee donated $42,000 to O’Donnell’s campaign, with Sen. John Cornyn, chairman of the organization, saying he personally, “strongly stand[s] by … Christine O’Donnell in Delaware.” It may not surprise you that de facto Tea Party leader Sarah Palin endorsed the ultra-Christian O’Donnell, but so has the powerful NRA and Greene’s opponent, DeMint. What’s more, all the media hype and GOP establishment support has made O’Donnell a household name, almost guaranteeing her a spot in politics regardless of how she fares on Election Day.
I’d be remiss to leave out the fact that, despite having earned a number of powerful supporters, polling suggests that O’Donnell is going to lose handily next month. And most Delaware voters don’t consider her qualified for office. But the point is that she was given a fair shot at winning, a shot that Greene—her political equal—never had.
Is it because O’Donnell is white? Is it because, unlike Greene, she didn’t have obscenity charges pending when she started her run? Is it because the modern GOP is more willing to tolerate borderline insanity than modern Democrats? I don’t know, and I don’t think we ever can. But I don’t like a climate in which news anchors ask unqualified black candidates if they’re “mentally sound,” as CNN’s Don Lemon did to Greene, while giving similarly unhinged white candidates a pass.
As far as we know, Alvin Greene never even prayed over a bloody altar while on a first date.
--Cord Jefferson is a staff writer at The Root. Follow him on Twitter.
They Built It. Some Came
Two days after One Nation, there is no official third-party estimate of the crowd size, which means that speculation about it has become the job of politically charged news organizations.

Media outlets of every stripe today are ignoring the message at the core of Saturday’s One Nation Working Together march—Americans need jobs—to focus instead on comparing it with Glenn Beck’s Restoring Honor rally. Held in August, Restoring Honor was the conservative soiree of the summer, drawing Sarah Palin, Alveda King and 87,000 Beck acolytes, according to CBS News. Though trumping Restoring Honor’s impressive turnout was never the stated goal of any of the hundreds of groups behind the NAACP-led One Nation Working Together, it goes without saying that to do so would have been quite a coup.
Two days after One Nation, there is still no official third-party estimate of the crowd size, which means that speculation about it has become the job of politically charged news organizations. If progressive Web site Crooks & Liars is to be believed, the NAACP and its partner organizations did indeed beat out the rally of Beck et al., with blogger Nicole Bell reporting that "satellite estimates put the crowd size at 175,000 to 200,000 at about noon EST." And at The Nation, Laura Stampler also puts forth the "175,000 attendees" statistic, a number provided by the One Nation team itself in its official march press release.
As the kids say, I call bull dung.
Having been on the ground for hours at both Restoring Honor and One Nation Working Together, I’m 100 percent confident that Restoring Honor dwarfed Saturday’s gathering, probably by as much as several thousand people. A friend who was also at both events feels similarly. "We were still [at One Nation] at 4," she told me. "The entire mall was emptied out and a speaker said, 'Just look at the size and diversity of our movement!' And you could practically hear crickets." Over at the Daily Beast, political reporter John Avlon writes, "For all the chanting about how 'the people, united, will never be divided,' this turnout was small."
It's worth noting that making accurate crowd estimates is difficult, that most rally organizers overestimate attendance and that The Root reported Restoring Honor as having hundreds of thousands of attendees, a number that was later shown to be grossly off-base. That said, it seems that, with so many reporters acknowledging the smaller size of One Nation Working Together, the 175,000-plus attendee statistic has to be scrapped. It's fairly clear: The right won this round.
There’s been a lot of talk about the “enthusiasm gap” lately. That is, the obvious disparity between GOP voters’ burning desire to fire Democrats in November and Democratic voters’ jaded willingness to submit to a Republican steamrolling. If the year’s biggest Washington Mall marches were any sign, not only is the enthusiasm gap real, but it’s about to end the careers of several Democratic politicians in less than a month. It's too bad for them that you can’t exaggerate vote tallies the way you can crowd estimates.
--Cord Jefferson is a staff writer at The Root. Follow him on Twitter.
White House Unconcerned About NAACP March
“I will put our record on education up against any administration at any economic time,” said Robert Gibbs.
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs today addressed concerns about Saturday’s One Nation Working Together rally, an event at which hundreds of unofficial Democratic allies will march to express their disappointment in the nation’s economy and educational system.
Led by the NAACP, but supported by activist groups in everything from LGBT rights to labor, One Nation Working Together might to some represent the Democratic base marching angrily away from an administration that, despite its best efforts, has failed to secure equality in jobs and education for America’s most downtrodden. Nevertheless, Gibbs swatted away questions about anxiety, saying that he was “very comfortable” with the administration’s work toward securing a better future for minorities.
“I will take our record for the past 20 months and compare it to the 20 months before that and feel very comfortable with that comparison,” said Gibbs.
The press secretary acknowledged that the administration would like to hurry out of the recession, but he said that reality was it would take time. And regarding education, Gibbs said he thinks the Obama administration has done as good, if not better, than every administration in history.
“I will put our record on education up against any administration at any economic time,” he said.
-Cord Jefferson is a staff writer at The Root. Follow him on Twitter.

















