Obama's 'Big' Vision for the State of the Union
Obama declares "We do big things" in a job-centered State of the Union address.
Being in the House chamber during a State of the Union address, rowdy and packed with the entire federal government, is often compared to being at a high school pep rally. Despite this year's mixed-seating arrangement -- designed to restrain the usual "rival football teams" show of cheers and grumbles from opposite sides of the aisle -- the scene at President Obama's speech on Tuesday still reflected two sides reacting very differently to his rallying call.
Taking on the optimistic theme of "Winning the Future," the president steered clear of an exhaustive list of every last policy matter he wants to tackle. Although he briefly touched on a range of priorities, including a defense of health care reform and the DREAM Act, the primary focus was laying out his broad vision for the country: America needs to get globally competitive, fast, and that's going to take more than Republican-backed spending cuts. If we're to create jobs moving forward, we need to meet the demands of a new age by investing in education, innovation and infrastructure.
"The rules have changed," Obama said, explaining that the days of finding a good factory job without a college degree are over. "In a single generation, revolutions in technology have transformed the way we live, work and do business."
With countries like China and India ahead of the curve, far outpacing America in education and new technologies, Obama explained his plan for not only catching up to but also outperforming the rest of the world.
The president's first speech before a joint session of the new Congress, now comprising a Republican-controlled House of Representatives and a Senate with six new GOP seats, came at a critical juncture. Almost two years after the passage of the Recovery Act, the national unemployment rate has stalled at about 9 percent, while the jobless rate for African Americans has climbed significantly higher, to nearly 16 percent. In the face of Obama's repeated insistence that robust economic recovery will take time, millions of out-of-work Americans are increasingly losing patience.
"I think the president was a stalwart commander in chief tonight," said Missouri Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus, who was encouraged by Obama's message. "He essentially told America that, despite the challenges of the past two years, we're on our way back up now and walking into a new door of opportunity."
These opportunities, as portrayed by Obama, must come from spending in innovation. "We'll invest in biomedical research, information technology and especially clean energy technology," he said of his vision for boosting research and development in his federal budget, which moves to Congress in a few weeks.
Specifically, Obama said he wants the nation to break its dependence on oil with biofuels, and lead the world in electric vehicles on the road -- 1 million by 2015. He challenged Congress to help him reach his goal of 80 percent of America's electricity coming from clean energy sources by 2035. Within 25 years, he wants 80 percent of Americans to have access to high-speed rail. On education, particularly making higher education more affordable, he asked lawmakers to permanently extend the tuition tax credit worth $10,000 for four years of college.
Pleased as Cleaver was by this discussion of the future, he expressed concern about the possibility that African Americans could be shut out. "If we're successful in approving a transportation bill, for example, we've got to take great care to have legislation designed that will require minority participation," he said.
Angela Glover-Blackwell, CEO of the PolicyLink research institute, shared Cleaver's caution. "We know the future is low-income people of color," she said, adding that 40 percent of Americans under 18 are, in fact, racial minorities. "In order for these populations to benefit from the jobs that the president outlined tonight, there is going to have to be a lot of detailed nuance and targeting."
The more immediate challenge is whether Congress can work together to even make any of this happen. Judging from the sharply divided response on the House floor, it's a dicey proposition. Democrats in the room bestowed hearty applause at the president's ambitious proposals, but the same ideas were met by disgruntled silence from Republicans, many who had already rejected his gotta-spend-money-to-make-money approach long before the speech.
"It's a question whether Congress will work together, despite all the 'Kumbaya' of tonight," said Cleaver. "Many people came to the joint session tonight with dates from the other party, and it remains to be seen whether this was a one-night stand. We're going to have to deal with the hard problems tomorrow morning."
President Obama also admitted that renewed investments must go hand in hand with reductions in the federal deficit and proposed a five-year freeze on domestic spending. He claimed that this will reduce the deficit by more than $400 billion over the next decade. His administration is also prepared to trim billions of dollars from the normally sacred-cow areas of defense, Medicare and Medicaid.
"I recognize that some in this chamber have already proposed deeper cuts," said Obama, alluding to a plan released last week by House Republicans to cut nondefense discretionary spending down to 2008 levels for the rest of the year, and then to the 2006 level for a decade. It's a move that would slash funding in precisely those areas that the president wants to grow, including education, transportation infrastructure, medical research and new energy. Despite the GOP stronghold on the House, the president pushed back.
"I'm willing to eliminate whatever we can honestly afford to do without," he continued. "But let's make sure that we're not doing it on the backs of our most vulnerable citizens. And let's make sure what we're cutting is really excess weight. Cutting the deficit by gutting our investments in innovation and education is like lightening an overloaded airplane by removing its engine. It may feel like you're flying high at first, but it won't take long before you'll feel the impact."
It's a clever-enough analogy, but probably not enough to budge the prevailing Republican view that additional government spending is unnecessary and wasteful.
"My response to the Republicans is that we can't afford not to make these investments in America's future," said Glover-Blackwell. "Just because we have challenges doesn't mean we turn our backs on children who need to be educated and adults who need to be put back to work. I'm disappointed that the battle lines are going to be drawn this way because it requires all of us to work together."
While on the subject of cuts, the president also resurrected the issue of Bush-era tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans, on which he compromised last month with a two-year extension. "If we truly care about our deficit, we simply cannot afford a permanent extension of the tax cuts for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans. Before we take money away from our schools, or scholarships away from our students, we should ask millionaires to give up their tax break," he said plainly. "It's not a matter of punishing their success. It's about promoting America's success."
To try to pull everyone back on board, the president closed with an inspirational anecdote about the spirit of American innovation. Recounting the story of Brandon Fisher of Pennsylvania, a small-business owner specializing in drilling technology, he revealed Fisher's design of equipment that led to the rescue of the trapped Chilean miners last October. Although his company was small, he concluded, it did big things.
"We do big things," Obama repeated, extending the concept to the nation. "From the earliest days of our founding, America has been the story of ordinary people who dare to dream. That's how we win the future."
Of course, it remains to be seen whether the president can bust through the comparatively less lofty Capitol Hill gridlock to drive us there.
Cynthia Gordy is the Washington reporter for The Root.
SOTUS: Virtual Reality
Putting tech savvy to use, the White House encourages online viewer participation during this year's State of the Union.
Now that every analyst and political junkie has weighed in on which themes President Obama should strike in the State of the Union tonight (or at least stocked up on liquor for the drinking game), all that’s left to do is tune in.
Rather than have folks merely sit at home and listen, the White House has launched an interactive web page encouraging viewer participation. Along with a live feed of the president’s speech, the site will feature real-time visual aids, charts and stats to further explain its message. Viewers can also submit questions from the new webpage, Twitter and Facebook, which administration officials will answer immediately afterward in a live online panel. Panelists include Brian Deese, deputy director of the National Economic Council, and Roberto Rodriguez, special assistant to the president for education policy.
"Part of what we’re trying to do this year is make the American people participate in the process, so it’s not just the president giving a speech," says Jen Psaki, White House deputy communications director. "It becomes a tool for discussion."
Tune in at 9 pm EST—just be careful out there if you plan on taking a drink every time the camera shows the First Lady.
Cynthia Gordy is the Washington Reporter for The Root.
Will Obama Address Black Unemployment in the State of the Union?
The president will focus on the economy and jobs in Tuesday's State of the Union address, but some wish he would sharpen his focus even more--on ever-present racial disparities.
As House Republicans fixate on dismantling health care reform, President Obama is readying his counter-offensive for Tuesday’s State of the Union address—pushing the jobs issue back to the forefront.
“My number one focus is going to be making sure that we are competitive, that we are growing, and we are creating jobs not just now but well into the future,” Obama said in a video emailed over the weekend to members of his grassroots group, Organizing for America. “And that's what is going to be the main topic of the State of the Union."
Enjoying a recent spike in approval ratings after his reassuring speech on the Tucson shootings, the president will likely get kudos for zeroing in on the subject that concerns voters the most. But some liberal advocacy groups, such as the Center for American Progress and the National Urban League, are wishing he would further sharpen his focus on the communities of color hardest hit.
It has been a while since Obama’s even mentioned racial differences in economic security—the 15.8 percent black unemployment rate, for example, compared to 8.5 percent for whites. And with the disparities having stayed the same, or gotten worse, during the recovery effort, the silence is deafening.
A new report by the Center for American Progress details how minorities have struggled disproportionately through the recession, noting that 74.7 percent of whites, but just 45 percent of African Americans, are homeowners. The study, and a recent “12-point blueprint for urban jobs” by the National Urban League, both recommend that the White House adopt policies that specifically target communities of color.
It’s a well-worn debate by now, in which the president has maintained that his first priority is achieving broad economic growth. By lifting the entire economy, as the talking point goes, he’s helping the African-American community as well. But two years later…isn’t it time for a new spin on that?
“That stance is not enough,” argues Christian E. Weller, a co-writer of the Center for American Progress report. “If we just focus on average growth it will take a lot longer for communities of color to get back to where they were before the recession, and that wasn’t a good situation to begin with.”
Though Weller applauds Recovery Act provisions that actually have targeted low-income communities, such as the 2009 summer job program for disadvantaged youth and job training grants for adults on public assistance, he says that the White House needs to get a handle on long-term structural issues. “We’re essentially looking at a bad decade for communities of color—these are not problems that just popped up in the recession.”
So, will any of this come up during tomorrow’s job-focused State of the Union address?
“I doubt it,” says Weller.
Yeah, it’s unlikely. But, having had a couple of years to put more thought into the matter, here’s hoping Obama will at least have a more elaborate plan to truly lift up all communities.
Cynthia Gordy is the Washington reporter for The Root.
Obama's Angry, Pragmatic Tax Address
Sounding more impassioned than he has since saying he was looking to “kick ass” during the BP oil spill, President Obama held a press conference at the White House today to talk about his controversial new tax package.
Sounding more impassioned than he has since saying he was looking to “kick ass” during the BP oil spill, President Obama held a press conference at the White House today to talk about his controversial new tax package.
Settled on with Republican leaders late yesterday, the tax plan will extend refundable tax credits (i.e. the Earned Income Tax Credit and the Child Tax Credit) and extend unemployment insurance for 13 months. All of Bush’s tax cuts will also be extended, which is the main point of contention for many Democrats, who trusted Obama when he said on the campaign trail that he would end Bush’s tax breaks for the wealthy. The president also agreed to not tax estates worth up to $5 million (in 2009, estates were untaxed up to $3.5 million).
To liberals, Obama’s concessions to the Republicans were outright treasonous, cowardly kowtowing to a GOP that already greatly enfeebled the left on November 2. Today, Obama, his eyes narrowing as he spoke, was having none of the naysaying.
“This has to do with what can we get done right now,” he said. “It’s very stark. We can’t get my preferred option through the Senate right now. As a consequence, if we don’t get my option through the Senate right now, and we do nothing, then on January 1st of 2011, the average family is going to see their taxes go up about $3,000. Number two: At the end of this month, two million people will lose their unemployment insurance.”
The president said that any inaction on his part in order to win political points would have resulted in trauma for average American families. “I’ve got an option of just holding fast to my position and, as a consequence, two million people may not be able to pay their bills and tens of millions of people who are struggling right now are suddenly going to see their paychecks smaller. Or alternatively, what I can do is I can say that I am going to stick to my position that those folks get relief, that people get help for unemployment insurance.”
My job is to look out for middle class families who are struggling to get by,” he added.
Several times the president seemed to address fellow liberals directly, or at least liberals who would question his commitment to his Democratic ideals. “I know there are some who would have preferred a protracted political fight,” he said, “even if it had meant higher taxes for all Americans, even if it had meant an end to unemployment insurance for those who are desperately looking for work. And I understand the desire for a fight. I’m sympathetic to that. I’m as opposed to the high-end tax cuts today as I’ve been for years. In the long run, we simply can’t afford them. And when they expire in two years, I will fight to end them, just as I suspect the Republican Party may fight to end the middle-class tax cuts that I’ve championed and that they’ve opposed.”
Tough talk was always immediately grounded by pragmatism in today’s speech, however. After saying that “a long political fight” might have appeased his base and been “good politics,” Obama said that it would have been bad for the country at large. “My responsibility as President is to do what’s right for the American people,” he said.
At the end of his remarks, Obama said, plainly, “This is a big, diverse country, and not everybody agrees with us. I know that shocks people. The New York Times editorial page does not permeate across all of America.” The words seemed angry, like those of an unlikely president who is tired of people expecting him to do unlikely things.
-Cord Jefferson is a staff writer at The Root. Follow him on Twitter.
House Could Vote on Black Farmers Case Today
An Obama administration official has hinted that the House will today vote on the long-running Pigford-Cobell lawsuit, thus coming one step closer to concluding a case that’s been drawn out for decades now.
An Obama administration official has hinted that the House will today vote on the long-running Pigford-Cobell lawsuits, thus coming one step closer to concluding cases that have been drawn out for decades now.
The possibility of a vote on the suits, which would give $4.6 billion to American Indian and African-American litigants slighted by the Departments of Interior and Agriculture, effectively canceled a White House Pigford-Cobell roundtable scheduled for today. Acting Deputy Director at the Office of Management and Budget Rob Nabors and Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights at the USDA Dr. Joe Leonard were to speak, but now the administration, which has come out in support of the litigants, will await an outcome.
On November 19, the Senate approved the Pigford settlement, which would give more than $1.1 billion to black farmers who faced racial animus when applying for USDA loans in the ‘80s and ‘90s. Today, proponents of the 1997 suit hope the House will do the same.
At the passage of the settlement in the Senate, Senator Harry Reid expressed his gratitude:
Black farmers … have had to wait a long time for justice, but now it will finally be served. I am heartened that Democrats and Republicans were able to come together to deliver the settlement that these men and women deserve for the discrimination and mismanagement they faced in the past.
-Cord Jefferson is The Root's Washington reporter. Follow him on Twitter.
















