How Republicans Could Sabotage the 1st Black Female Attorney General Nominee

Her confirmation battle is just one of the ways they’re trying to snowplow the president’s immigration-reform plan.

U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York Loretta Lynch and President Barack Obama
U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York Loretta Lynch and President Barack Obama Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images

If it weren’t for all this snow falling in the nation’s capital, you’d probably catch a glimpse of that perfect storm brewing over President Barack Obama’s now-famous executive order on immigration reform.

It has, once again, emerged as a point of contention on the salted streets between Capitol Hill and the White House, with the forecast telling us that this one shows no signs of letting up. Department of Homeland Security employees are biting their nails to the nub in anticipation of another budget-related shutdown; undocumented immigrants fret over the specter of deportations; and the sister who could become the nation’s first black female attorney general is suddenly in a state of confirmation limbo.

On the last point, Republicans have managed to cook up a nasty Black History Month calculus wherein they could successfully sabotage Obama’s nomination of Loretta Lynch to become the first black woman running the Department of Justice—and get away with it—since folks these days seem more interested in Amber Rose and Khloe Kardashian’s Twitter beefs than they are in the possibility of a failed Lynch nomination.

With a Republican-appointed Texas federal judge ruling, predictably, on Monday against Obama’s order, House and Senate Republicans are looking to reclaim their mojo—potentially by challenging Lynch and by forcing a DHS shutdown, knowing that they didn’t pay much of a political price for the shutdown in 2014.

Thus, a proverbial come-to-Jesus moment on immigration seems likely in the last frigid days of February.

And on Feb. 27 we’ll have a better sense of what’s next. As House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) desperately grabs at immigration as his imaginary switch to whip a raucous caucus into line, the GOP-dominated Senate is stalled. Meanwhile, Hill Dems want to sidestep a House-GOP-approved DHS-funding bill loaded with poison pills that all but obliterate the president’s quick-fix immigration reprieve.

To have Homeland Security shut down is a weird twist for Republicans, since they’re usually the ones crying about spilt security milk, lone-wolf terrorists and decapitating Islamic State, or ISIS, militants at the doorstep. But they’ve seized on the idea of cutting off DHS funding as a means of thwarting the president’s immigration-reform efforts, which would be overseen by Homeland Security.

Without funding, the department—with a $61 billion budget (pdf) overseeing critical security functions like the Secret Service, border protection, Transportation Security Administration agents and the Coast Guard—will shut down. 

And a day before Homeland Security is expected to shut down, the Senate is scheduled to vote on whether to confirm Lynch as attorney general. Her confirmation vote was recently ditched into a two-week postponement because of Senate-Republican objections made, they say, so that they can “get an indication from her of the independence that she’s going to have from the White House,” Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) told The Hill last week.

That’s senator-ese for “What’s her stance on immigration?”