RNC Chair Priebus Denounces Rancher Bundy’s ‘Negro’ Rant, but GOP’s Race Problems Continue

After the outcry over Cliven Bundy’s “Negro” rant, prominent Republicans are backpedaling away from the Nevada rancher.

Posted:
 
486511221-rancher-cliven-bundy-speaks-during-a-news-conference
Rancher Cliven Bundy speaks during a news conference near his ranch April 24, 2014, in Bunkerville, Nev. The Bureau of Land Management and Bundy have been locked in a dispute for a couple of decades over grazing rights on public lands.

David Becker/Getty Images

On Thursday, Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus forcefully denounced Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy’s controversial comments about slavery. In a statement to CNN, Priebus said, “Bundy’s comments are completely beyond the pale. Both highly offensive and 100 percent wrong on race.”

Bundy, who in recent weeks has become a hero on the political right for his standoff with the federal government over land-grazing fees, had this to say about black Americans: “And I’ve often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy?”

In a statement to The Root reacting to Bundy’s comments, Orlando Watson, who serves as the RNC’s communications director for black media, echoed Priebus’ disgust, saying, “Bundy isn’t an elected official or spokesman for any party, so his comments are his own. Nevertheless, they should be—and rightfully were—denounced. Such views on race are disturbing and heinous.”

But off the record, some Republicans have gone further, expressing frustration with the series of verbal missteps, particularly pertaining to race, that have hampered the party’s aggressive efforts to recruit more racial minorities. This past year, the RNC not only hired more African-American staff members in its quest to diversify but has also been aggressively courting Republican candidates of color, resulting in 11 black Republican candidates—a record number—slated to run in Alabama in upcoming elections. But many of these efforts have been overshadowed by high-profile incidents of conservatives making unsavory comments about race.

Considering how dismally the GOP has fared among black voters in the last two election cycles, some may wonder why it’s bothering to woo black voters at all. The answer is simple: The Obama era is almost over, and previous elections, before the history-making first African-American president was ever on the ballot, indicate that some black voters are willing to vote for Republicans when given a good reason to do so. Black voters in Ohio voted for George W. Bush in double digits in 2004. The result? Bush won the state over John Kerry and ultimately won the election.

Another reason for Republicans to be optimistic is that polling has shown that younger black voters of the post-civil rights generation are more likely to identify as independents than their parents, who tend to identify as stalwart Democrats. This was one of the findings of the national poll conducted for my book, Party Crashing: How the Hip-Hop Generation Declared Political Independence, in 2007.

Many of those voters may have felt a measure of loyalty or inspiration from President Barack Obama, whom they helped make history. That doesn’t mean they’ll be Democratic loyalists for life. So it’s not an unrealistic goal for Republicans to believe they may be able to court and, ultimately win, some—not all, but some—of these voters.

But that will remain tough to do when people like Bundy, a conservative folk hero who initially attracted the support of a number of major Republican figures—like Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, who’s a leading 2016 presidential contender—goes out and makes racially offensive comments. And Bundy is far from alone: I have written extensively about the many missteps on race that Republican elected officials, candidates and activists have made over the last few years.

The question becomes, can the GOP really ever reinvent itself as a party of diversity and inclusion, when a number of those already included in the party clearly do not believe in those principles, even if its leaders, like Priebus, do?

Raynard Jackson, a black Republican operative, expressed optimism that Priebus will help the party turn the tide with black voters. He noted that there used to be a time when a racially inflammatory incident would happen and people would wonder if anyone with seniority within the Republican Party would take some responsibility and respond. But, he says, that’s changed under Priebus: “During his chairmanship, he has shifted the conversation.” When it comes to denouncing racism and racist comments, says Jackson, under Priebus, “The expectation is no longer if, but when. That is a huge shift in expectations.”

Comments
The Root encourages respectful debate and dialogue in our commenting community. To improve the commenting experience for all our readers we will be experimenting with some new formats over the next few weeks. During this transition period the comments section will be unavailable to users.

We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your continued support of The Root.

While we are experimenting, please feel free to leave feedback below about your past experiences commenting at The Root.