Who’s Up for a National Talk on Race? No One

All of us practice deliberate denial about race. So why have a dialogue no one is ready for?

Generic image (Thinkstock)
Generic image (Thinkstock)

(The Root) — I just finished reading an editorial in Virginia’s Richmond Times-Dispatch, the dominant newspaper in the city I now call home. It reminded me why I’m so skeptical about the idea of a national conversation on race.

It was about the death earlier this week of 98-year-old former U.S. Sen. Harry F. “Little Harry” Byrd Jr., a descendant of Virginia’s most prominent dynasty whose cheeks, the editorial assured us, “glowed russet and red.” He was also, the newspaper went on to say, a man of character and charm who “aligned himself with unfortunate sentiments.”

Unfortunate sentiments, indeed! Byrd was a leader of one of the most vicious assaults on racial justice in the history of the U.S., the so-called massive resistance campaign designed by his equally bigoted father, Harry F. Byrd Sr., one of the architects of the infamous “Southern Manifesto.” It involved shutting down public schools that agreed to desegregate and subsidizing a network of so-called segregation academies by providing tuition grants to white students. It used state funds — including taxes collected from African Americans — to give white kids an education while leaving many blacks to fend for themselves.

Equating Byrd’s participation in this racist crusade with an alignment with “unfortunate sentiments” is like comparing Godzilla to the GEICO Gecko. Being a segregationist was not, as the Times-Dispatch seems to imply, merely a blot on the career of a public-spirited politician with a reputation for rectitude, personal integrity and fiscal restraint. It was the bedrock of his political philosophy.

Nor was massive resistance simply an example of how otherwise “good people subscribed to scurrilous views and inflicted grave harm,” as the editorial blandly opines. It enjoyed the support of Virginia’s power structure, including influential newspapers like the Times-Dispatch itself. It was at the very heart of the system of white supremacy and racial oppression that has been embedded in our nation’s political, legal and social systems since the U.S. was founded.

A few years ago the Times-Dispatch apologized for its support of massive resistance. Byrd never did. Any fair and objective summation of Byrd’s career would not sugarcoat that reality. It should have been the first line in that editorial, not an afterthought.

Which brings me back to why this editorial reinforced my skepticism about a national conversation on race. Simply put, it’s because I just don’t think most white folks are ready for one.