Eric Holder's Reforms: Justice Delayed

The attorney general's criminal-justice plans sound good, but many states have already taken the lead on this issue.

Posted:
 
holder_reform_aug2020
Generic image (Thinkstock)

(The Root) -- When I first heard Attorney General Eric Holder's plan to change Justice Department charging policy regarding low-level, nonviolent drug offenders, my initial reaction was that the Obama administration finally was taking an affirmative move that would benefit the black community, just as President Obama had for other groups -- women, gays and immigrants -- whose strong support were key in his election victories.

The Holder announcement is a step in the right direction. Rarely, if ever, has the top law-enforcement official in the country acknowledged that the U.S. criminal-justice system is weighted heavily against minorities and the poor and needs to be fixed. The attorney general is modifying federal prosecutors' charging policies so that "certain low-level, nonviolent drug offenders who have no ties to large-scale organizations, gangs or cartels will no longer be charged with offenses that impose draconian mandatory minimum sentences." 

Sounds like progress.

But the facts are that several states, some led by Republican governors and legislatures, have taken the lead on this issue. And the rate for which blacks have been locked up in federal and state prisons and local jails has been dropping over the past decade.

Few government policies have decimated the black community like the escalation of incarceration started in the early 1970s and the launch of the war on drugs in the 1980s. Since then, the U.S. prison population has skyrocketed from 500,000 to more than 2.3 million, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The cycle of arrest-incarceration-rearrest destroys families and whole neighborhoods. African Americans and the poor in particular are hit hard by federal and state criminal-justice policies. Currently, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics and the U.S. Census Bureau, blacks account for 13 percent of the U.S. population but 38 percent of federal and state inmates. Whites are 63 percent of the U.S. population and 34 percent of inmates.

But the impact of the changes Holder announced likely will have little impact on the outdated policies of the federal system. And they pale compared to criminal-justice overhauls in some states, including New York, Kentucky, Kansas and New Jersey, all of which have seen declines in their state prison populations after they eased mandatory minimum sentences and, in some instances, expanded diversion programs.

For instance, in the early 2000s, Kansas made probation and drug treatment mandatory for people convicted for a first or second time of simple drug possession. In 2011 alone, 18 states passed laws that limited the use of incarceration for specified offenders, eliminated certain drug-policy sentencing disparities and eased mandatory minimum sentencing practices, according to a February 2013 report from the Sentencing Project. In Texas and Arkansas alone, a combination of increasing drug treatment as an alternative for nonviolent offenders and broadening parole guidelines reduced the states' prison population by more than 6,000 last year.

Meanwhile, according to the Sentencing Project report, the incarceration rates for blacks has declined, significantly so for black women. From 2000 to 2009, the incarceration rate for black women dropped by about 31 percent. At the start of that decade, black women were imprisoned at a rate six times higher than for white women. By the end of the decade, the rate had dropped to 2.8. For black men, the incarceration rate dropped by almost 10 percent. In 2000, black men were 7.7 times more likely to be incarcerated than white men. By 2009, they were 6.4 times more likely to be incarcerated than white men. 

Over the same 10 years, according to the report, the incarceration rate for white women increased by about 47 percent and for white men by 8.5 percent.

Like many advocates who have been working to change mandatory-minimum sentencing laws, Julie Stewart, president of Families Against Mandatory Minimums, called the Justice Department policy changes a step a right direction. But Stewart told the Washington Post that "what's being proposed here is very modest."

Comments
The Root encourages respectful debate and dialogue in our commenting community. To improve the commenting experience for all our readers we will be experimenting with some new formats over the next few weeks. During this transition period the comments section will be unavailable to users.

We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your continued support of The Root.

While we are experimenting, please feel free to leave feedback below about your past experiences commenting at The Root.
Must-See Family Attractions
July 29 2014 2:13 PM