Alabama County May Change Voting Rights

Shelby, which is challenging Section 5, has changed, but voter advocates say work is still needed.

Alabamians stand outside the U.S. Supreme Court during arguments for Shelby County v. Holder. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Alabamians stand outside the U.S. Supreme Court during arguments for Shelby County v. Holder. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

(The Root) — Drive beyond the tall iron gates of Highland Lakes in Shelby County, Ala., where homes range from $350,000 to a couple of million, and you’ll see that change has come to the South. Children of different races play together outside, while adults tend the yard or jog along the roads and trails.

In the blue-collar Shelby County town of Calera, billboards downtown advertise black-owned businesses. At the Hardee’s restaurant on the edge of downtown, blacks and whites, mostly sporting University of Alabama or Auburn paraphernalia, laugh and talk together over a morning biscuit and gravy with coffee on the side.

Shelby County is about 30 minutes away from the historic 16th Street Baptist Church, where four little girls were killed in 1963, after a bomb planted by KKK members exploded. Shelby County is also just over an hour’s drive from Selma, the place where marchers were brutally beaten in 1965 as they attempted to march to Montgomery in a stand for voting rights.

Today, Shelby County is also the center of the challenge to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, which requires that in certain states with a history of discrimination, changes to election procedures must be approved by the U.S. Department of Justice. The Supreme Court heard arguments in Shelby County v. Holder on Feb. 27 and is expected to make a ruling soon.

Shelby County maintains that the preclearance requirement is no longer needed and that vestiges of discrimination have been eliminated. They are backed in their challenge by Edward Blum and the conservative American Enterprise Institute. They argue that while Section 5 was necessary in 1965 to overcome the never-ending mischief that election officials employed to keep African Americans from registering and voting, those days are long gone. 

In an article published in U.S. News & World Report, Blum said, “Today, in the states and jurisdictions still subject to the ‘preclearance’ requirement of Section 5 (which prohibits any changes in election laws or procedures before Washington’s approval) minorities register to vote and turn out in elections at rates that exceed those of whites. It makes no sense today for Alaska, Arizona and Alabama to be subject to these requirements, but not Nevada, Arkansas or Tennessee.”

But in Shelby County, black voters, potential candidates and voting-rights advocates say that without the protections guaranteed through Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, they don’t have a chance of being elected or having blacks or browns in influential positions in government.

The case before the Supreme Court comes out of Calera, a Shelby County city of about 12,000 people. Ernest Montgomery is the only African American on the City Council in Calera. The other five members of the council are white men, and so is the mayor of the city, the population of which is nearly 23 percent African American. Montgomery possibly wouldn’t be on the council at all had it not been for the U.S. Justice Department’s objection to the redrawing of council district lines.