Mr. President, Get a Handle on the Scandals

With the Benghazi flap on top of the IRS scandal, Obama has to act now or risk an ugly second term.

(The Root) — Last week, with the Dow Jones industrial average breaking 15,000, war raging in Syria, a guilty verdict in the Jodi Arias trial and nearly round-the-clock coverage of the (mercifully) found victims of the Cleveland kidnappings, House Republicans were fighting an uphill battle to make a splash with committee hearings on the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that left four Americans dead.

And the GOP had no one but itself to blame.

Because after four-and-a-half years of their cynical charges that every foreign policy decision made by President Barack Obama was either “dithering,” “apologizing,” “leading from behind” or an inability to “call evil evil,” it shouldn’t really surprise Republicans — or anyone else — that when it was time for Congress to litigate a hard-to-unravel episode like Benghazi in the court of public opinion, a big chunk of the public was tuning them out.

Given that they’ve effectively ignored at least a dozen embassy attacks over the last decade, the outrage exhibited by congressional Republicans over what they call a Benghazi “whitewash” takes gall.

But after Friday’s report that the State Department’s Benghazi talking points underwent a series of revisions — obscuring, at least initially, terrorist involvement in the attacks — and news that the Internal Revenue Service targeted Tea Party groups claiming tax-exempt status, storm clouds have rapidly gathered over the administration. And if Obama can’t figure out how to thoroughly deal with these controversies — quickly — he won’t have anyone to blame but himself, either.

Get a handle on these scandals, Mr. President, or you’re going to have a very ugly second term.

On Benghazi, I don’t buy charges of a cover-up, but I do think National Journal’s Michael Hirsh was right when he argued that if it isn’t a scandal, it looks at least as if it was handled with a fair measure of “tragic incompetence,” because there’s never been a satisfying answer as to why more military assets weren’t deployed during the attack.

The State Department’s Benghazi review board (pdf) has concluded, “The interagency response was timely and appropriate, but there simply was not enough time for armed U.S. military assets to have made a difference” (emphasis added). Which leads to a fair question: