Regardless of the content of their addresses Monday morning at the annual “King Day at the Dome” rally at the State House in Columbia, S.C., the joint appearance of NAACP President Benjamin Todd Jealous and U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder speaks volumes in and of itself. Monday marks the first time Holder will have been in the Palmetto State since Dec. 23, when the U.S. Department of Justice struck down its new voter photo ID law, which the DOJ says would likely have disenfranchised minorities, students and disabled voters alike.
The optics of their joint appearance — the leader of the nation’s oldest and most storied civil rights organization and the country’s top law-enforcement officer — send a signal about the intent, through legal challenges and social advocacy, to make voting rights a high priority in an already contentious election year. The rally takes place five days before the South Carolina primary.
The United States is a nation with a patchwork of laws on voter identification — some states with strict policies, others with no policy at all. Thirty-one states require voters to show IDs before voting. In 2011 eight states — Alabama, Kansas, Mississippi, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Wisconsin — enacted variations of the same rule, requiring some form of photo identification. Critics of the laws argue that they disenfranchise voters of color and young voters, who are less likely to possess and be able to afford the required identification.
In an interview with The Root before his South Carolina address, Jealous spoke about the importance of the Justice Department action against South Carolina, the possible impact of new voter ID laws and the strategies for blunting their potentially suppressive impact on voter turnout in the 2012 election.
Jealous, who has appeared at previous King Day at the Dome rallies, noted that the 2012 event takes place amid growing attention to voter ID laws in general, and specifically a tough new immigration law enacted in South Carolina. A federal judge blocked some of that law’s more restrictive parts, such as allowing police and authorities to check the immigration status of any suspect. But the amended measure — widely seen as a copycat of Arizona’s controversial immigration law — went into effect on Jan. 1, despite lawsuits by the Justice Department and advocacy groups.
“This state, like so many others in the Deep South, has engaged in state-sponsored voter suppression,” Jealous said. “Two years ago we were dealing with a recession; what’s different this year is that the state has sought to focus special energy on suppressing voters of color. But there’s also been a ruthless attack here on migrant workers’ rights. The attack on the rights of immigrants will be a focus of my comments [Monday] and on this march.”