Occupy Wall Street and Affirmative Action

The protests -- and Abigail Fisher's lawsuit -- remind us that inequality affects white people, too.

Getty Images
Getty Images

The Occupy Wall Street phenomenon has a thing or two to teach us about, of all things, affirmative action.

One of those affirmative-action-all-the-time spells will most likely be on us again — soon. Abigail Fisher has appealed to the Supreme Court in her 2008 case against the University of Texas at Austin — denied by the 5th Court of Appeals — for not admitting her despite an academic record that would have gained a black or Latino applicant admission.

Forecasts suggest that the Supremes will likely hear the case before June — unless UTA succeeds with its current strategy of stonewalling in response to the high court’s request for a preliminary response to the challenge of its admissions policy. However, that will work for only so long, in which case the decision would happen in late 2012 or soon thereafter.

Surely there will be editorials against Fisher’s grievance, if the past is any indication, calling attention to the persistence of racism, questioning traditional conceptions of academic merit and pointing out that George W. Bush was a mediocre student and yet became president because of family connections.

For black people who support OWS’ focus on addressing inequality — and we can assume that is most, despite qualms with OWS’ methods — it’s time to seriously engage the fact that we do not have a lock on needing action of the affirmative sort. How about speaking up for affirmative action based on inequality among all people, rather than just those with brown skin?

Giving people a leg up in admissions policies to acknowledge the obstacles they have faced is fine. But rejecting students on the basis of their not happening to be brown is much trickier to defend. Decisions in favor of such practices, such as 1978’s Regents of the University of California v. Bakke and 2003’s Grutter v. Bollinger, continue to attract vociferous challenges.

And it’s too easy to say that the reason for their legal challenges is racism, ignorance or a combination. One might argue that white complainants like Barbara Grutter, and now Fisher, seeking “affirmation” of their hard work, are missing a few points: that America was founded on racism. That black unemployment is higher than white unemployment. That black men have trouble getting cabs in New York.