Can the Left Regain Its Passion?

RightWatch: The Tea Party stole the civil rights movement's playbook. Progressives must get it back.

Posted:
 
tea20party400
Getty Images

It may be a while before we learn whether the agreement to raise the nation's debt ceiling really is as awful as economists like Lawrence Summers fear, but one thing about it is certain. The Tea Party's remarkable victory reminds us that a radical splinter group can seize control of the issues and impose its will by threatening to wreck the system if it does not get its way.

That is a lesson that the left used to know back in the days of the civil rights and anti-Vietnam War movements but seems to have forgotten since the presidential election of Barack Obama. The old distinction once drawn between mass social movements and political campaigns was lost in the emotional fervor aroused by the triumph of the first African-American president.

A lot of us acted as though Obama's election was an end in itself, rather than a means to accomplishing the change that his candidacy promised. But the election was never really about just getting Obama elected. It was about our ability to compel the new president and the Democratic majority in both houses of Congress to respond to our needs and our demands.

To do that, we still needed a movement, separate and apart from the president's political apparatus, that could support him when he did the right thing and pressure him when he didn't. As evangelical activist Jim Wallis recently wrote, "it was the robust activism of those independent progressive movements of the past that created the space for major reforms and made other presidencies memorable. That's because social change does not ultimately rest on who is in the White House, but a movement outside of Washington, D.C., that makes fundamental reforms possible."

We used to know that back in the day. In the 1960s we even acted on it, prodding the government into enacting civil rights laws, ending the Vietnam War and halting the military draft. None of those things would have happened without aggressive mass protest movements.

But the sad truth is that ever since Obama's election, the passion has been on the other side. We seem to have concluded that by electing Obama, we accomplished the goals of our movement, and that's all we needed to do.

And while we were resting on our laurels, the opposition became fired up. In a parody of mass movements of the past, they took to the streets, voted in blocks and even held a rally at the Lincoln Memorial on Martin Luther King's birthday under the leadership of Glenn Beck, who pronounced himself heir to the philosophy of nonviolence.

You can take the analogy too far. On one level, the Tea Party is no more than a front for big-money corporate interests such as the notorious Koch brothers and the hedge fund managers who shower contributions on House Majority Leader Eric Cantor. These fat cats' interests are the ones truly served by the Tea Party's refusal to ask the wealthy to pay a far share of the costs of the commonweal.

But on another level, despite all the wrongheadedness of its reactionary populism, the Tea Party is an authentic mass movement with grassroots support and a set of (admittedly wacko) principles that its troops can rally around, remaining unified even in the face of harsh opposition to its nonnegotiable demands. Their relentless determination and refusal to compromise gives them enormous power.

You don't defeat a movement like that with conventional politics.

Comments
The Root encourages respectful debate and dialogue in our commenting community. To improve the commenting experience for all our readers we will be experimenting with some new formats over the next few weeks. During this transition period the comments section will be unavailable to users.

We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your continued support of The Root.

While we are experimenting, please feel free to leave feedback below about your past experiences commenting at The Root.