Missing the Point on MLK

Our focus on his speeches shows how much we've forgotten the difference -- one Dr. King knew well -- between words and action.

Posted:
 
(Continued from Page 1)

That, for me, is King's most interesting message at this point: Performance alone does not make people less poor or less oppressed.

Following King for real: When Tavis Smiley convened yet another forum last week and posed Cornel West's question from some years ago -- "What can a blues nation learn from a blues people?" -- we, in the name of King, properly look beyond that sonorous phraseology and ask what will concretely come out of a sense that we "blues people" are going to "teach" America anything important. The question is how to make black people's lives better, and white people who need to buy groceries don't have to "learn" anything in order for that to happen.

Following King for real: Other people's performances are no more interesting than our own. Accordingly, we must question why what Sarah Palin thinks or doesn't think about race in America should concern us more than, for example, how to make people's lives better. When Republicans threaten to discontinue funding for shepherding ex-cons back into society -- a key race issue gathering steam in New York, D.C. and elsewhere -- that should concern us.

Focusing on Sarah Palin? Excuse me, but why? Indeed, you have to wonder what Dr. King would have thought about what catches our attention.

John McWhorter is a lecturer at Columbia University and a contributing editor to the New Republic.

Like The Root on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.

John McWhorter is a contributing editor at The RootHe is an associate professor at Columbia University and the author of several books, including Winning the Race: Beyond the Crisis in Black America and Our Magnificent Bastard Tongue: The Untold History of English.

Like The Root on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.