Go Slow, Oslo!

The Obama Peace Prize is nice, but it could turn out that the Nobel Committee was a little premature with all their adoration.

Posted:
 
(Continued from Page 2)

On one hand, it’s sort of a no-brainer, like the International Olympic Committee awarding the 2016 games to Rio—they couldn’t pass on the first South American host nation, and the Nobel folks were hard-pressed to find a name-brand candidate who did more in 2009 to try to advance the cause of peace on Earth.

On the other hand, the Nobel Prize is kind of a secular sainthood—recognition for those who’ve put in work on behalf of their fellow man. For MLK, it was recognition of a lifetime spent promoting nonviolent resistance to injustice. For would-be President Al Gore, it was a consolation prize.

President Obama might save the world, and he might leave behind the same two wars that he inherited. This is one time when the committee could have waited a little longer to see how things play out. If there’s a sovereign Palestinian state living in harmony with Israel a couple of years from now, they’ll look like geniuses. If Obama winds up green-lighting an air strike on Iran’s nuclear reactors, in hindsight it’ll seem like the Nobel folks shot their wad a tad too soon.

Uh, thanks?

If you’re Obama, you’re looking at the Nobel committee like, “Do I get a three-speed bike and a tie-dyed shirt, too?

Comments
The Root encourages respectful debate and dialogue in our commenting community. To improve the commenting experience for all our readers we will be experimenting with some new formats over the next few weeks. During this transition period the comments section will be unavailable to users.

We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your continued support of The Root.

While we are experimenting, please feel free to leave feedback below about your past experiences commenting at The Root.