On Hampton’s Hair Rules

A years-old cornrow-and-dreadlock ban highlights a culture mired in the "politics of respectability."


(The Root) — When I hit the campus of Hampton University as a senior in the fall of 2007, I had one thing on my mind: Free the Jena Six.

The Iraq War made me pay attention, Hurricane Katrina angered me, the murder of Sean Bell left me disillusioned, but when I heard the story of the six young black men facing years in prison for what amounted to a schoolyard fight, I decided that it was time to get off the sidelines.

I spent that entire summer getting involved in the online activism that pushed the case to national prominence. I would be entering school that fall as the editor-in-chief of the campus newspaper, the Hampton Script, and I let it be known that my number one objective was to be an advocate for those teens from Jena, La. The summer was long and lonely, but I knew that when I got to school, I’d have the support of one of the nation’s oldest and most celebrated HBCUs.

It didn’t exactly work out that way.

Most of my peers were on the same page I was, and none of us anticipated the resistance we would face from Hampton’s administration. At the same time that I was being denied access to funds to sponsor a trip for students to participate in the rally being held in Louisiana, the fraternities looking to host a rally and forum on campus met with a frustrating runaround.

Initially the on-campus rally was approved. No less than a day later, the organizers were told no. Finally they were given a different time from the original plan — a slot when fewer students would be available to attend.

The reasoning given for the rescheduled rally was that there was a pep rally for the football team taking place that same day and time. But when we at the newspaper looked into it, we realized that the pep rally had never appeared on any of the student-activity calendars, and the football coach informed us that they would never agree to a pep rally on the day of the game because it would interfere with their pregame scheduling. Our administration had lied to us.

The administration likely maintains to this day that it was all a misunderstanding, but from where my classmates and I sat, it felt as if they didn’t want us getting involved in any form of activism — at least, not with anything that could be seen as controversial or “radical.” And when I look back at our experiences over the four years there, that seems pretty consistent with the administration’s views.