4 Questions With Mumia Abu-Jamal's Attorney

Christina Swarns says the high-profile death-penalty case is not at all unique.

(Continued from Page 1)

The reaction shows the discomfort people are having with the death penalty. There's no question people are being wrongfully convicted. Both cases are really good examples of how unreliable evidence can still yield convictions.

TR: Who's the next Mumia? Who else is on death row despite questionable evidence against them?

CS: I represent people throughout the South in death cases, and my colleagues represent people condemned thought this country. In every case I have handled, there are similar issues to Mumia's case -- improper jury instructions, evidence of mitigation that's not presented and evidence of prosecutorial misconduct.

The problem with Mumia's case is that it's not at all unique. The story is being told and retold in courtrooms around the country. It is the norm, not the exception.

Jenée Desmond-Harris is a contributing editor to The Root.

Like The Root on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.

The Root encourages respectful debate and dialogue in our commenting community. To improve the commenting experience for all our readers we will be experimenting with some new formats over the next few weeks. During this transition period the comments section will be unavailable to users.

We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your continued support of The Root.

While we are experimenting, please feel free to leave feedback below about your past experiences commenting at The Root.
The Root 100 People's Choice Awards  
Sept. 19 2014 8:34 AM