The Pro-Joe Paterno Voices Are Heard

Jemele Hill writes in her ESPN column that a majority of the 1,400 emails she received about her column saying Paterno had to go were sympathetic.

Joe Paterno (Getty Images)

In her ESPN column, Jemele Hill writes that she was excoriated by Joe Paterno fans because of a column she wrote saying Penn State had no choice but to let him go. She concludes, "Hypocritical protectionism is dangerous."

I'm not surprised that my column on Joe Paterno elicited such a strong reaction. I anticipated that, since the story is centered on his knowledge of and reaction to the alleged sexual abuse of children.

But I didn't anticipate that the majority of the nearly 1,400 emails I received in response to it would express strong support and sympathy for Paterno.

I see an irony here in that a lot of the people who responded in support of Paterno sound exactly like those who supported Michael Vick, both before and after he was convicted of dog fighting charges.

Read Jemele Hill's entire column at ESPN.

Like The Root on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter.   

The Root encourages respectful debate and dialogue in our commenting community. To improve the commenting experience for all our readers we will be experimenting with some new formats over the next few weeks. During this transition period the comments section will be unavailable to users.

We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your continued support of The Root.

While we are experimenting, please feel free to leave feedback below about your past experiences commenting at The Root.